Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV

1/27/2020
07:20 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Ransomware Costs More in Q4

In Q4 of 2019, the average ransom payment increased by 104% to $84,116, finds Coveware report.

Coveware's Incident Response Platform has encountered a number of ransomware incidents in its deployment. Coveware has taken the aggregated anonymized ransomware data from cases that have been handled (and resolved) and reported about it in its blog.

It discusses data points like the average ransom amounts, data recovery rates and ransomware attack vectors. Coveware also makes the point that unlike surveys, which rely on sentiment, its report is created solely from a standardized set of data collected from every case.

This stricter methodology may help to legitimize what it has to say, since the total number of incidents used by the report is not available.

Coveware found that the total cost of a ransomware attack is going to be a function of the severity and duration of the attack. Financial costs include the ransom payment, if one is made, and the costs of remediation of a network and its hardware, which may be substantial.

Coveware saw the average number of days that a ransomware incident lasts is now 16.2 days. This is up from the 12.1 days that showed up in the third quarter of 2019.

It may be that ransomware is affecting larger organizations with more complex networks that will take a longer amount of time to fix after an attack. This could drive up the length of the incident.

In Q4 of 2019, the average ransom payment increased by 104% to $84,116, up from $41,198 in Q3 of 2019. While the median ransomware payment in Q4 was $41,179, the doubling of the average appears to reflect the diversity of threat actors that are actively attacking companies.

Some ransomware variants, such as Ryuk and Sodinokibi, appear to have moved into the large enterprise space. These two are focusing their attacks on large companies, where they can attempt to extort the organization for a seven-figure payout. For instance, Ryuk ransom payments reached a new high of $780,000 for impacted enterprises.

Yet, in Q4 of 2019, 98% of companies that paid the ransom did receive a working decryption tool, the same as last quarter. Some strains like Phobos, Rapid and Mr. Dec have been known as laggards on providing decryptors however.

Q4 2019 saw Sodinokibi as the most prevalent type of ransomware by incident count. It is not uncommon for a single Sodinokibi attack to create hundreds of individual small business victims.

Ryuk was again the second most common type of ransomware during Q4. The average Ryuk ransom amount rose dramatically and Coveware thought that this accounted for the majority of the change in the average ransom payment doubling during the quarter.

As far as the vectors of ransomware, Coveware found that, "During Q4, the lower end ransomware-as-a-service variants such as Dharma and Phobos continued to exploit cheap and easy attack vectors like RDP. The more sophisticated groups like Sodinokibi also use RDP when available, but have also been observed exploiting more technically complex CVE’s, and using email phishing."

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises Are Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Environment
The adoption of cloud services spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in pressure on cyber-risk professionals to focus on vulnerabilities and new exposures that stem from pandemic-driven changes. Many cybersecurity pros expect fundamental, long-term changes to their organization's computing and data security due to the shift to more remote work and accelerated cloud adoption. Download this report from Dark Reading to learn more about their challenges and concerns.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-43394
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-24
Unisys OS 2200 Messaging Integration Services (NTSI) 7R3B IC3 and IC4, 7R3C, and 7R3D has an Incorrect Implementation of an Authentication Algorithm. An LDAP password is not properly validated.
CVE-2022-0177
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-24
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - DOM in GitHub repository mrdoob/three.js prior to 0.137.0.
CVE-2021-36343
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-24
Dell BIOS contains an improper input validation vulnerability. A local authenticated malicious user may potentially exploit this vulnerability by using an SMI to gain arbitrary code execution in SMRAM.
CVE-2021-36349
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-24
Dell EMC Data Protection Central versions 19.5 and prior contain a Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the DPC DNS client processing. A remote malicious user could potentially exploit this vulnerability, allowing port scanning of external hosts.
CVE-2021-43588
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-24
Dell EMC Data Protection Central version 19.5 contains an Improper Input Validation Vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service.