Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV //

Malware

10/18/2018
11:05 AM
Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson
News Analysis-Security Now
50%
50%

GreyEnergy Group Tied to Power Plant Attacks in Ukraine & Poland

Research from ESET has uncovered a new group called GreyEnergy, which appears to have targeted power plants in the Ukraine and Poland. The malware has also been linked to a previous group dubbed BlackEnergy.

A new threat group called GreyEnergy has been targeted power plants and other critical infrastructure in the Ukraine and Poland over the last three years, and the malware used in these attacks has been linked to a previous malicious actor dubbed BlackEnergy.

In addition, the new research from ESET has found similarities between GreyEnergy and Telebots, the group that is believed responsible for the NotPetya ransomware attacks that targeted Ukraine last year, causing wide-spread havoc. (See UK Accuses Russia of Launching NotPetya Attacks.)

The new research is quick to note that it cannot tie all these different attacks to same Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) group or nation-state, but there are specific links between all three including "code similarities, shared C&C infrastructure, malware execution chains, and so on."

(Source: iStock)
(Source: iStock)

It appears that GreyEnergy has been operating in stealth mode for at least three years, and has been carefully targeting critical infrastructure and facilities in Eastern Europe. ESET researchers believes that the malware behind the group is being used specifically for reconnaissance and espionage, including backdoor, file extraction, taking screenshots, keylogging, as well as password and credential stealing.

It's possible that group behind GreyEnergy was conducting research in anticipation of a cyberattack.

The research also found that GreyEnergy does not specifically target Industrial Control Systems (ICS). Instead, the malware focuses on workstations that handle supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems, which control the critical infrastructure of power plants.(See Industrial Manufacturing Sector Increasingly Susceptible to Cyber Attacks.)

In order to enter these systems, GreyEnergy uses either traditional spearphishing techniques, or it will look for a compromised, public-facing web server. Once inside, the attackers attempt to move laterally from one workstation to the next.

The group also uses some publicly available tools such as Mimikatz, PsExec, WinExe and Nmap as part of its attack.

However, it's the tied between GreyEnergy and BlackEnergy that are the most troubling.

Before disappearing, BlackEnergy conducted an attack against a power plant in the Ukraine that left 230,000 people in the dark. As soon as BlackEnergy vanished, GreyEnergy appeared.

The October 17 ESET research note finds that BlackEnergy and GreyEnergy have zeroed in on similar targets. Besides these shared victims, ESET notes that the malware and techniques used by both groups are similar:

Compared to BlackEnergy, GreyEnergy is a more modern toolkit with an even greater focus on stealth. One basic stealth technique -- employed by both families -- is to push only selected modules to selected targets, and only when needed. On top of that, some GreyEnergy modules are partially encrypted using AES-256 and some remain fileless -- running only in memory -- with the intention of hindering analysis and detection. To cover their tracks, typically, GreyEnergy's operators securely wipe the malware components from the victims' hard drives.

Additionally, BlackEnergy and GreyEnergy each use active Tor relays to connect back to their command-and-control servers, which helps unsure a level of stealth.

During the early part of its investigation, ESET researcher noticed that in December 2016, GreyEnery used an early version of the TeleBots' NotPetya worm. This was about six months before it as altered and used in the 2017 ransomware attack against Ukrainian businesses and other organizations.

These types of attacks against critical infrastructure, as well as the ICS and SCADA systems that help run these facilities, need to serve as a wake-up call, according to Bob Huber, the chief security officer at cybersecurity firm Tenable. He noted that all these types of attacks show how vulnerable some facilities are to groups that are willing to spend the time and effort to plan out these operations.

"Since the blackout in Ukraine in December 2015, and likely long before that, advanced adversaries have been stealthily targeting critical infrastructure around the world, learning more and more about the mission-critical systems as they go. Each new event is a canary in the coal mine that we cannot downgrade to isolated incidents," Huber wrote in an email. "Persistent threats like this one underscore the importance of holistic visibility across IT and OT assets. Blind spots are where advanced adversaries live. Shining a light on those areas is key to stopping an attack in its track."

Related posts:

— Scott Ferguson is the managing editor of Light Reading and the editor of Security Now. Follow him on Twitter @sferguson_LR.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities and attack visibility drove some significant changes in enterprise cybersecurity strategies over the past year. Dark Reading's 2021 Strategic Security Survey showed that many organizations are staying the course regarding the use of a mix of attack prevention and threat detection technologies and practices for dealing with cyber threats.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-42556
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
Rasa X before 0.42.4 allows Directory Traversal during archive extraction. In the functionality that allows a user to load a trained model archive, an attacker has arbitrary write capability within specific directories via a crafted archive file.
CVE-2021-42840
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
SuiteCRM before 7.11.19 allows remote code execution via the system settings Log File Name setting. In certain circumstances involving admin account takeover, logger_file_name can refer to an attacker-controlled PHP file under the web root, because only the all-lowercase PHP file extensions were blo...
CVE-2021-29835
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
IBM Business Automation Workflow 18.0, 19.0, 20.0, and 21.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X...
CVE-2021-41171
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
eLabFTW is an open source electronic lab notebook manager for research teams. In versions of eLabFTW before 4.1.0, it allows attackers to bypass a brute-force protection mechanism by using many different forged PHPSESSID values in HTTP Cookie header. This issue has been addressed by implementing bru...
CVE-2021-42836
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
GJSON before 1.9.3 allows a ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) attack.