Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV

// // //
5/29/2019
06:00 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb

HawkEye Malware Finds Renewed Life With Financially Motivated Actors

IBM X-Force researchers have reported an increase in the HawkEye v9 keylogger infection campaigns after they looked at data from the IBM X-Force effort during April and May 2019.

IBM X-Force researchers have reported an increase in the HawkEye v9 keylogger infection campaigns after they looked at data from the IBM X-Force effort during April and May 2019.

The researchers found that the older, but still potent, malware is targeting businesses around the world. Malicious third parties have long appreciated that the malware has a good reputation for its abilities as a dropper of other payloads (along with the key logging it can do) via botnets that can be controlled on its behalf. These botnets-as-a-service have been a longstanding revenue stream for those who have sold HawkEye over the past six years.

Those behind the malware have seemed to be financially motivated from the beginning, selling the malware as well as providing software updates so it would be considered to be a "commercial" product. If the data they got from the tool wouldn't make them a score, then they would sell the tool instead.

So, there are many HawkEye customers out there who can implement differing campaigns from many differing locations. It's not just a single threat actor, but all of the actors that are popping up alongside HawkEye do seem to be alike in that they are -- like the original author -- financially motivated.

Businesses have the money honey to attract an attack from this kind of bad guy. This should not come as a big surprise.

X-Force saw that in April 2019, HawkEye campaigns were aimed at many different business sectors including transportation and logistics, healthcare, import and export, marketing, agriculture, as well as others.

The IP addresses that originated the malspam came from Estonia, while users were targeted in countries around the globe. IP origin is not a reliable detector of a threat actor's location.

The businesses were initially attacked with a wave of social engineering. X-Force says that the malspam messages came disguised as an email from a large bank in Spain, but "other messages carrying HawkEye infections came in various formats, including fake emails from legitimate companies or from other banks."

Financially motivated, indeed. Companies and banks give them the initial shelter they want, so that they are able to gain entry to the workplace unnoticed. If you have previously dealt with some organization, social engineers hope that the trust barriers between you and the organization are less raised and that you will be more likely to click that link.

HawkEye wasn't always so active. It sort of went zombie in 2017, then reappeared in 2018 as "Hawkeye Reborn v8." It may have gotten a new owner-operator around the same time, since it was rapidly renamed "Hawkeye Reborn v9."

But however it changes as it goes on, security defenses will have to adjust.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Incorporating a Prevention Mindset into Threat Detection and Response
Threat detection and response systems, by definition, are reactive because they have to wait for damage to be done before finding the attack. With a prevention-mindset, security teams can proactively anticipate the attacker's next move, rather than reacting to specific threats or trying to detect the latest techniques in real-time. The report covers areas enterprises should focus on: What positive response looks like. Improving security hygiene. Combining preventive actions with red team efforts.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-1813
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-22
OS Command Injection in GitHub repository yogeshojha/rengine prior to 1.2.0.
CVE-2022-1809
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21
Access of Uninitialized Pointer in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.7.0.
CVE-2022-31267
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21
Gitblit 1.9.2 allows privilege escalation via the Config User Service: a control character can be placed in a profile data field, such as an emailAddress%3Atext '[email protected]\n\trole = "#admin"' value.
CVE-2022-31268
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21
A Path Traversal vulnerability in Gitblit 1.9.3 can lead to reading website files via /resources//../ (e.g., followed by a WEB-INF or META-INF pathname).
CVE-2022-31264
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21
Solana solana_rbpf before 0.2.29 has an addition integer overflow via invalid ELF program headers. elf.rs has a panic via a malformed eBPF program.