Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV

// // //
9/26/2019
09:30 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb

Enterprise Ransomware & Consumer Ransomware: They're Not That Different

RiskSense researchers identified 57 vulnerabilities that are heavily tied to ransomware threats in enterprises and government organizations as opposed to individuals.

RiskSense has announced the results of the RiskSense Spotlight Report for Enterprise Ransomware. The report analyzes the most common vulnerabilities used across multiple families of ransomware targeting enterprises and government organizations.

RiskSense researchers identified 57 vulnerabilities that are heavily tied to ransomware threats in enterprises and government organizations as opposed to individuals. The data was gathered from a variety of sources including RiskSense proprietary data, publicly available threat databases, as well as other findings from RiskSense threat researchers and penetration testers.

The report found that 65% of ransomware was targeting high-value assets like servers. Surprisingly, close to 55% of the ransomware had CVSS v2 scores lower than 8, which means they were judged to be less than "high" or "critical." Also, nearly 35% of the identified vulnerabilities are from 2015 or earlier, and the vulnerabilities used by WannaCry are still in use today.

RiskSense thinks that ransomware cost businesses more than $8 billion in 2018.

"While consumer ransomware targets Windows and Adobe vulnerabilities, enterprise ransomware targets high-value assets like servers, application infrastructure, and collaboration tools since they contain an organization’s critical business data," said Srinivas Mukkamala, CEO of RiskSense. "While not totally unexpected, the fact that older vulnerabilities and those with lower severity scores are being exploited by ransomware illustrates how easy it is for organizations to miss important vulnerabilities if they lack real-world threat context."

Twenty-four of the 30 "CVSS less than 8" vulnerabilities were loose in the wild. An organization that uses CVSS scores as its exclusive means to prioritize vulnerabilities for patching is sure to miss vulnerabilities that are used by ransomware.

Fifteen of the 57 noted vulnerabilities were in use by multiple families of enterprise ransomware. Since the same code is often reused in multiple products, 17 trending vulnerabilities with active exploits in the wild affected more than one technology vendor. The 57 vulnerabilities are spread across 12 vendors, which likewise were tied to 33 different products. Microsoft had by far the most vulnerabilities with 27, followed by RedHat (six), Adobe (five), Oracle (five) and Apache (four).

The report found that vulnerabilities from as far back as 2010 continue to be active with ransomware in the wild. In total, 31.5% of the analyzed vulnerabilities were from 2015 or earlier (18 out of 57), and 16 of those vulnerabilities continue to be trending in 2018 or 2019.

One universal characteristic of the vulnerabilities analyzed in the dataset was the enabling of remote code execution (RCE) or privilege escalation (PE). These traits should be considered important indicators when considering the prioritizing of patching efforts. Ransomware families may use multiple vulnerabilities in their efforts. Cerber was found to incorporate the most, using a total of 17 vulnerabilities, 16 of which are trending. Grandcrab was next with 11 vulnerabilities, nine trending. Both the SamSam and Satan malware tied with nine vulnerabilities, all of which were trending. PrincessLocker, which runs as a Ransomware-as-a-Service campaign and is tightly associated with the RIG exploit kit, had seven vulnerabilities.

It's important to recall that Server Message Block (SMB) and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) exploits have played a big role in the evolution of ransomware.The wormable nature of the SMB-based Eternal Blue vulnerability allowed an attacker to easily spread from host to host, infect additional devices, and move laterally within a network. The report shows that real-world outcomes should be part of any security response, especially when ransomware is considered.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Everything You Need to Know About DNS Attacks
It's important to understand DNS, potential attacks against it, and the tools and techniques required to defend DNS infrastructure. This report answers all the questions you were afraid to ask. Domain Name Service (DNS) is a critical part of any organization's digital infrastructure, but it's also one of the least understood. DNS is designed to be invisible to business professionals, IT stakeholders, and many security professionals, but DNS's threat surface is large and widely targeted. Attackers are causing a great deal of damage with an array of attacks such as denial of service, DNS cache poisoning, DNS hijackin, DNS tunneling, and DNS dangling. They are using DNS infrastructure to take control of inbound and outbound communications and preventing users from accessing the applications they are looking for. To stop attacks on DNS, security teams need to shore up the organization's security hygiene around DNS infrastructure, implement controls such as DNSSEC, and monitor DNS traffic
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2023-33196
PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Craft is a CMS for creating custom digital experiences. Cross site scripting (XSS) can be triggered by review volumes. This issue has been fixed in version 4.4.7.
CVE-2023-33185
PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Django-SES is a drop-in mail backend for Django. The django_ses library implements a mail backend for Django using AWS Simple Email Service. The library exports the `SESEventWebhookView class` intended to receive signed requests from AWS to handle email bounces, subscriptions, etc. These requests ar...
CVE-2023-33187
PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Highlight is an open source, full-stack monitoring platform. Highlight may record passwords on customer deployments when a password html input is switched to `type="text"` via a javascript "Show Password" button. This differs from the expected behavior which always obfuscates `ty...
CVE-2023-33194
PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Craft is a CMS for creating custom digital experiences on the web.The platform does not filter input and encode output in Quick Post validation error message, which can deliver an XSS payload. Old CVE fixed the XSS in label HTML but didn’t fix it when clicking save. This issue was...
CVE-2023-2879
PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
GDSDB infinite loop in Wireshark 4.0.0 to 4.0.5 and 3.6.0 to 3.6.13 allows denial of service via packet injection or crafted capture file