Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV

10/13/2017
05:07 PM
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
50%
50%

Cisco Talos Team Tackles Top-Tier TXT Threat

Talos researchers have taken down an attack aimed at the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Archetypically, hackers are unseen cloaked mysteries that run free in the night and pillage with impunity. It's not until daybreak that the damage is reckoned. Hackers hunt and exploit the vulnerable. But they themselves are also the hunted.

Cisco Talos, which describes itself as an industry-leading threat intelligence group "fighting the good fight," sends metaphorical hunters out into the night to expose and freeze-out the hackers. Anyone doing this job is imagined as a bounty hunter, but on some nights, they wear a badge that shows they are fighting not for themselves, but for national security.

In this case, the Talos team hunted down a new Spear Phishing campaign that mimicked emails from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to drop a malware payload -- hosted on US state government servers. This was a classic delivery methodology -- using a highly targeted and individualized attack, dropped through email and dependent on the opening of a Microsoft Word document. But the invasive asset placement and operational aspect here spark multiple questions about the general security of state property as a launchpad from apparent security sleeper cells.

"This attack appeared to target IT, financial and insurance companies, [but] this is possibly an incomplete list," Craig Williams, senior technical leader at Cisco Talos, told SecurityNow. "We believe organizations were targeted, not [specific] people, and that this attack is the result of a well-funded group of sophisticated attackers."

The ability to spoof the SEC and then host malware within the government perimeter is deeply worrying. It brings into question not just the integrity of humans reading emails, or the amount of government server real estate that seems to be up for grabs, but also the seeming loss of sensitive government documents that are the bridgehead to spear phishing attacks in general.

With this attack, we do at least have some historical DNA to work from. Organizations targeted here were similar to those targeted during a previous DNSMessenger campaign. In this instance, the infection process used DNS TXT records to create a bidirectional command and control channel. Using this channel, the attackers directly interacted with the Windows Command Processor using the contents of DNS TXT record queries and the associated responses generated on the attacker-controlled DNS server. Hackers made it difficult for anyone in forensics to observe what had been going on.


You're invited to attend Light Reading's 11th annual Future of Cable Business Services event. Join us in New York on November 30 for the premier independent conference focusing on the cable industry's continuing efforts in the commercial services market – all cable operators and other communications service providers get in free. 

"The use of obfuscation as well as the presence of a complex multi-stage infection process indicates that this is a sophisticated and highly motivated threat actor that is continuing to operate," said Talos in a statement. So, is it still active or has it been retired? "The core components are offline though previously infected machines may still be at risk," said Talos' Williams.

Of note, this malware organ featured the capability to leverage WMI, ADS, scheduled tasks, as well as registry keys to obtain persistence for further exploitation. According to Talos, the use of DNS as a conveyance for later-stage code and two-way communications is also becoming more and more commonplace.

If anyone is out there hunting them, this is at least a start to what the hackers look like, and where they hide.

Related posts:

— Simon Marshall, Technology Journalist, special to Security Now

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "The truth behind Stonehenge...."
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27886
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
rakibtg Docker Dashboard before 2021-02-28 allows command injection in backend/utilities/terminal.js via shell metacharacters in the command parameter of an API request. NOTE: this is NOT a Docker, Inc. product.
CVE-2016-8153
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8154
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8155
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8156
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.