Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

2/6/2019
09:00 AM
Jai Vijayan
Jai Vijayan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail

7 Tips for Communicating with the Board

The key? Rather than getting bogged down in the technical details, focus on how a security program is addressing business risk.
2 of 8

1. Use Metrics That Relate to Business Objectives
Board members and other business leaders are not security experts. Metrics on vulnerability reduction, threats blocked, and attacks mitigated are more meaningful when presented in the overall context of business risk reduction.
'Metrics should be related directly to business objectives,' says Chris Morales, head of security analytics at Vectra. 'How does operational process impact the company's ability to respond, and how does that relate to selling product in the market?' 
Numbers also should reflect simple trends based on objectives. 'No one at the board level cares about how much malware you blocked every month,' he notes.
Image Source: Shutterstock

1. Use Metrics That Relate to Business Objectives

Board members and other business leaders are not security experts. Metrics on vulnerability reduction, threats blocked, and attacks mitigated are more meaningful when presented in the overall context of business risk reduction.

"Metrics should be related directly to business objectives," says Chris Morales, head of security analytics at Vectra. "How does operational process impact the company's ability to respond, and how does that relate to selling product in the market?"

Numbers also should reflect simple trends based on objectives. "No one at the board level cares about how much malware you blocked every month," he notes.

Image Source: Shutterstock

2 of 8
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
csoandy
50%
50%
csoandy,
User Rank: Author
2/13/2019 | 10:25:19 AM
Too tactical
"Don't use FUD" might be the best advice here, even if "highlight legal consequences" doesn't follow it. The goal is to meet the Directors where they are. Understand their goals & beliefs, and work to meet them there. Explain the implications of recent news. Discuss the long term implications of risk — and highlight the benefits of wise risk choices being made. Don't be seen as the person who only criticized the business.
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: -when I told you that our cyber-defense was from another age
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18934
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
Unbound 1.6.4 through 1.9.4 contain a vulnerability in the ipsec module that can cause shell code execution after receiving a specially crafted answer. This issue can only be triggered if unbound was compiled with `--enable-ipsecmod` support, and ipsecmod is enabled and used in the configuration.
CVE-2012-6070
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
Falconpl before 0.9.6.9-git20120606 misuses the libcurl API which may allow remote attackers to interfere with security checks.
CVE-2012-6071
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
nuSOAP before 0.7.3-5 does not properly check the hostname of a cert.
CVE-2012-6135
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
RubyGems passenger 4.0.0 betas 1 and 2 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files during the startup process.
CVE-2016-10002
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
Node-cookie-signature before 1.0.6 is affected by a timing attack due to the type of comparison used.