Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

2/6/2019
09:00 AM
Jai Vijayan
Jai Vijayan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

7 Tips for Communicating with the Board

The key? Rather than getting bogged down in the technical details, focus on how a security program is addressing business risk.
Previous
1 of 8
Next

Image Source: Shutterstock

Image Source: Shutterstock

CISOs and other security leaders are under growing pressure to improve how they communicate with boards of directors.

Cybersecurity has become a board-level issue in many organizations amid growing concerns over the regulatory, financial, and reputational implications of data breaches and security failures. In fact, Gartner expects that by 2020, 100% of large organizations will be asked to report to their boards at least once annually on cybersecurity risk — up from the 40% that are required to do so currently.

That means security leaders will need to overcome their traditional communication challenges and find new and better ways to convey technology risk.

Ensuring board awareness about key metrics of cybersecurity programs has become critically important, says Greg Reber, partner at Moss Adams, a Seattle-based accounting, consulting, and wealth management firm. Board members need to be able to track not just cybersecurity events and actions, but also new and emerging threats. They also require a continuous assessment of how a program is doing, along with a road map of cybersecurity-related projects and their goals, Reber says.

"Cybersecurity is a relatively new risk but aligns very directly within traditional BoD oversight duties," he notes.

Here are the key steps for effectively communicating with the board.

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 8
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
csoandy
50%
50%
csoandy,
User Rank: Author
2/13/2019 | 10:25:19 AM
Too tactical
"Don't use FUD" might be the best advice here, even if "highlight legal consequences" doesn't follow it. The goal is to meet the Directors where they are. Understand their goals & beliefs, and work to meet them there. Explain the implications of recent news. Discuss the long term implications of risk — and highlight the benefits of wise risk choices being made. Don't be seen as the person who only criticized the business.
The Security of Cloud Applications
Hillel Solow, CTO and Co-founder, Protego,  7/11/2019
Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "SpearPhish! Everyone out of the office!"
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-10100
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-17
tinymce 4.7.11, 4.7.12 is affected by: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation. The impact is: JavaScript code execution. The component is: Media element. The attack vector is: The victim must paste malicious content to media element's embed tab.
CVE-2019-12175
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-17
In Zeek Network Security Monitor (formerly known as Bro) before 2.6.2, a NULL pointer dereference in the Kerberos (aka KRB) protocol parser leads to DoS because a case-type index is mishandled.
CVE-2019-12475
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-17
In MicroStrategy Web before 10.4.6, there is stored XSS in metric due to insufficient input validation.
CVE-2019-13346
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-17
In MyT 1.5.1, the User[username] parameter has XSS.
CVE-2019-13403
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-17
Temenos CWX version 8.9 has an Broken Access Control vulnerability in the module /CWX/Employee/EmployeeEdit2.aspx, leading to the viewing of user information.