Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

9/25/2019
12:00 PM
Jai Vijayan
Jai Vijayan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

5 Updates from PCI SSC That You Need to Know

As payment technologies evolve, so do the requirements for securing cardholder data.
Previous
1 of 6
Next

Image source: PCI SSC

Image source: PCI SSC

More than 1,300 stakeholders from across the payments industry convened in Vancouver this month for the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council's (PCI SSC) North America Community Meeting.

Key topics on the agenda included a new security standard for contactless payments on off-the-shelf mobile devices, development of the next major version of the PCI Data Security Standard, and a soon-to-be released new version of the PCI standard for point-to-point encryption (P2PE). Also announced at the Vancouver event was a new Security Framework that will guide the PCI Security Council's standards and decision-making processes in the years ahead.

Much of the focus of the initiatives is on extending PCI security standards to new and emerging payment technologies such as contactless payments on mobile devices. Under the new Strategic Framework, stakeholders will have more of a say in how standards for payments security evolve in coming years. Increasingly, the focus is on ensuring organizations meet the intent and objectives of the PCI security standard and not just on whether they have the recommended controls in place or not.

For well more than a decade, all organizations handling payment card data, both directly and indirectly, have had to comply with PCI DSS. The standard — developed by MasterCard, Visa, American Express, Discover, and JCB — prescribes a set of security requirements for protecting credit and debit card data.

The controls are designed to ensure that organizations handling payment card data have secure networks and systems, secure payment applications, strong access control mechanisms, and a robust vulnerability management program and that they regularly test and monitor their networks for security issues. Numerous companies that have experienced payment card data breaches in recent years have had to pay fines and face other consequences for failing to comply with PCI requirements.

Here are five items that were on top of the agenda at the North America Community meeting in Vancouver.

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 6
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Black Hat Q&A: Hacking a '90s Sports Car
Black Hat Staff, ,  11/7/2019
The Cold Truth about Cyber Insurance
Chris Kennedy, CISO & VP Customer Success, AttackIQ,  11/7/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16863
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
STMicroelectronics ST33TPHF2ESPI TPM devices before 2019-09-12 allow attackers to extract the ECDSA private key via a side-channel timing attack because ECDSA scalar multiplication is mishandled, aka TPM-FAIL.
CVE-2019-18949
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
SnowHaze before 2.6.6 is sometimes too late to honor a per-site JavaScript blocking setting, which leads to unintended JavaScript execution via a chain of webpage redirections targeted to the user's browser configuration.
CVE-2011-1930
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
In klibc 1.5.20 and 1.5.21, the DHCP options written by ipconfig to /tmp/net-$DEVICE.conf are not properly escaped. This may allow a remote attacker to send a specially crafted DHCP reply which could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of any process which sources DHCP options.
CVE-2011-1145
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
The SQLDriverConnect() function in unixODBC before 2.2.14p2 have a possible buffer overflow condition when specifying a large value for SAVEFILE parameter in the connection string.
CVE-2011-1488
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
A memory leak in rsyslog before 5.7.6 was found in the way deamon processed log messages are logged when $RepeatedMsgReduction was enabled. A local attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of the rsyslogd daemon service by crashing the service via a sequence of repeated log messages sent withi...