Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News & Commentary

10/15/2019
02:00 PM
AJ Nash
AJ Nash
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

5 Steps to Protect Against Ransomware Attacks

Paying a ransom is strongly discouraged by experts. So, how do you protect your organization?

Because of a few key elements, ransomware is a growing threat for all Internet-connected enterprises. First, the barrier to entry in terms of cost is very low for adversaries because ransomware is inexpensive to purchase on the Dark Web. Second, ransomware is often distributed via email, which is also inexpensive (if not free) and can be used for targeted or random attacks. Finally, ransomware exploits the weakest element of cybersecurity: people.

Recently, the news of attacks in Atlanta, Baltimore, and throughout Texas have shown just how devastating ransomware attacks can be to state and local governments.

  • Atlanta spent more than $2.6 million in 2018 to recover from an attack, where adversaries demanded roughly $50,000.
  • In 2019, Baltimore will likely endure more than $18 million in expenses to recover from a ransomware attack that demanded 13 bitcoin (roughly $75,000).
  • In Texas, widespread ransomware attacks have affected computer systems in 22 municipalities, with one mayor confirming that attackers demanded $2.5 million.

While the specific ransomware used in each of these attacks was different, there is a common theme that ran through these ransomware attacks: Intended victims were not prepared to respond.

While ransomware continues to rise, most experts and the FBI strongly discourage paying ransom because A) paying ransom does not guarantee systems or data will be restored, and B) paying ransom makes a victim much more likely to be targeted again.

How to Prepare for Ransomware Attacks
If you don't pay a ransom, how do you reduce the impact of ransomware attacks? There are five best practices that can greatly reduce the likelihood of being attacked and, more importantly, can greatly reduce the impact if and when a ransomware strike occurs.

1. Asset identification and management: Having a current configuration management database and crown jewels assessment (CJA) are crucial. (A CJA identifies cyber assets that are most critical to the accomplishment of an organization's mission.) Adversaries will target a combination of the most valuable and most vulnerable systems and data. You will want to view your environment from the perspective of an adversary.

2. Patch management: Knowing your own environment is not much value if you don't also protect it. Most attacks are not flashy "zero-day" exploits. Adversaries are recyclers who will gladly use an old exploit against a new target. A prime example of this is Heartbleed, an attack that still successfully capitalized on a five-year-old vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160) because victim organizations refuse to adapt. Don't be an easy target!

3. Threat intelligence: While most cybersecurity organizations continue to focus their gaze internally, the only way to move from reactive to proactive is through intelligence. Cybersecurity professionals who understand threat trends and the landscape, which includes adversaries, tactics, techniques, and procedures, are empowered to capitalize on such knowledge to prevent attacks.

4. Automation: Organizations are overrun with massive amounts of data, information, and intelligence. Considering the skills gap that is still challenging the industry, there is rarely enough time in the day to adequately address all critical or high-level security events, let alone the moderate and low risks. Only through automation, wherein machines capitalize on high-fidelity intelligence to take actions without human intervention, can cyber defenders have the time needed to focus on the biggest-impact security matters.

5. Training: Whether in the physical world or cyberspace, people continue to be the weakest link. A robust training program, one that continually incorporates rewards and retraining, will keep personnel aware and vigilant when it comes to the types of phishing campaigns that often lead to ransomware attacks.

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "Works of Art: Cybersecurity Inspires 6 Winning Ideas"

AJ Nash has more than two decades of experience in intelligence collection, analysis, reporting, briefing, process improvement, and leadership. Prior to Anomali, he was a Senior Manager of Cyber Threat Intelligence at Capital One, Global Head of Cyber Intelligence at ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: -when I told you that our cyber-defense was from another age
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2011-3350
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
masqmail 0.2.21 through 0.2.30 improperly calls seteuid() in src/log.c and src/masqmail.c that results in improper privilege dropping.
CVE-2011-3352
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
Zikula 1.3.0 build #3168 and probably prior has XSS flaw due to improper sanitization of the 'themename' parameter by setting default, modifying and deleting themes. A remote attacker with Zikula administrator privilege could use this flaw to execute arbitrary HTML or web script code in the context ...
CVE-2011-3349
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
lightdm before 0.9.6 writes in .dmrc and Xauthority files using root permissions while the files are in user controlled folders. A local user can overwrite root-owned files via a symlink, which can allow possible privilege escalation.
CVE-2019-10080
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
The XMLFileLookupService in NiFi versions 1.3.0 to 1.9.2 allowed trusted users to inadvertently configure a potentially malicious XML file. The XML file has the ability to make external calls to services (via XXE) and reveal information such as the versions of Java, Jersey, and Apache that the NiFI ...
CVE-2019-10083
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
When updating a Process Group via the API in NiFi versions 1.3.0 to 1.9.2, the response to the request includes all of its contents (at the top most level, not recursively). The response included details about processors and controller services which the user may not have had read access to.