Vulnerabilities / Threats
10/18/2010
07:56 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Stonesoft Warns Of Complex Hacking Technique Vulnerability

Intrusion detection and prevention systems are subject to exploitation by attackers employing multiple simultaneous evasion methods, cautions the Finnish security firm.

Strategic Security Survey: Global Threat, Local Pain
Strategic Security Survey: Global Threat, Local Pain
(click image for larger view and for full slideshow)
Most intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) are vulnerable to being exploited by attackers who combine multiple evasion techniques at once, according to Stonesoft, a Finnish security firm.

"These threats are difficult to detect because the IPS cannot easily categorize or reference what it is seeing," said Stonesoft. "Add several evasions together, and evade at multiple levels simultaneously, and you have a method the IPS can no longer recognize." Indeed, the IPS or IDS wouldn't even know that it had been exploited. Stonesoft said it discovered the vulnerabilities while testing its own IPS product.

According to Jack Walsh, intrusion detection and prevention program manager at security testing organization ICSA Labs, part of Verizon Business, "We were able to validate Stonesoft's research and believe that these advanced evasion techniques can result in lost corporate assets with potentially serious consequences for breached organizations."

What's an example of how an AET works? Almost any IDS or IPS would stop attackers who try to use packet fragmentation -- a technique for fooling a firewall into loading the wrong packets, to evade security controls -- said a Stonesoft spokesperson. "However, if this is combined with random IP options and a manipulation of how data is to be interpreted on the target -- Big Endian/Little Endian -- the attacker can successfully deliver a payload containing any attack." (Big Endian and Little Endian refer to how processors handle the most versus the least significant bytes they must process.)

Stonesoft shared details of the vulnerabilities with the Finnish national computer emergency response team (CERT-FI), which will coordinate information sharing with affected vendors. While no specific manufacturers have been disclosed, Jussi Eronen, head of vulnerability coordination at CERT-FI, said, "the issues identified by Stonesoft affect a range of content inspection technology."

Furthermore, even though AETs aren't exploits but rather techniques for fooling an IDS or IPS, CERT-FI said that it "considers these techniques to be vulnerabilities, as they successfully subvert existing protections."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3051
Published: 2014-10-29
The Internet Service Monitor (ISM) agent in IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager (ITCAM) for Transactions 7.1 and 7.2 before 7.2.0.3 IF28, 7.3 before 7.3.0.1 IF30, and 7.4 before 7.4.0.0 IF18 does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof s...

CVE-2014-3668
Published: 2014-10-29
Buffer overflow in the date_from_ISO8601 function in the mkgmtime implementation in libxmlrpc/xmlrpc.c in the XMLRPC extension in PHP before 5.4.34, 5.5.x before 5.5.18, and 5.6.x before 5.6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via (1) a crafted first argument t...

CVE-2014-3669
Published: 2014-10-29
Integer overflow in the object_custom function in ext/standard/var_unserializer.c in PHP before 5.4.34, 5.5.x before 5.5.18, and 5.6.x before 5.6.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via an argument to the unserialize function ...

CVE-2014-3670
Published: 2014-10-29
The exif_ifd_make_value function in exif.c in the EXIF extension in PHP before 5.4.34, 5.5.x before 5.5.18, and 5.6.x before 5.6.2 operates on floating-point arrays incorrectly, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption and application crash) or possibly exec...

CVE-2014-3694
Published: 2014-10-29
The (1) bundled GnuTLS SSL/TLS plugin and the (2) bundled OpenSSL SSL/TLS plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.10 do not properly consider the Basic Constraints extension during verification of X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and ob...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.