Vulnerabilities / Threats
10/19/2009
06:32 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Mozilla Restores Blocked Microsoft Extension For Firefox

A controversial Firefox extension is working again after being blocked as a security risk over the weekend.

Mozilla reversed its decision to block a Microsoft extension for Firefox that was disabled last week because the software was believed to represent a security risk.

The extension at issue, Microsoft's .Net Framework Assistant, has been removed from the Mozilla Add-on blocklist.

The Add-ons blocklist prevents unsafe Firefox extensions from being loaded when Firefox starts. The blocklist currently includes eight other browser extensions that present stability or security issues.

In a post on Friday, Mike Shaver, Mozilla's vice president of engineering, said that Mozilla, with the support of Microsoft, had disabled the Add-on as a security precaution.

Then on Sunday, Shaver said in a blog post that Microsoft's .NET Framework Assistant was restored following Microsoft's confirmation that the extension could not be used to exploit a serious Internet Explorer vulnerability, MS09-054.

A related plugin, Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), remains blocked, however.

The .Net Framework Assistant provides support for Microsoft's ClickOnce software installation technology, which lets .Net apps download and run within browsers.

It's also a source of ongoing controversy because Microsoft distributed it through its Windows Update service without asking Firefox users if they wanted it. Microsoft also made the extension difficult to remove initially.

Worries about the risk posed by the .Net extension first surfaced in February. As a post on Annoyances.org put it, "This update adds to Firefox one of the most dangerous vulnerabilities present in all versions of Internet Explorer: the ability for Web sites to easily and quietly install software on your PC."

Because some Firefox users may require ClickOnce functionality, Shaver said that Mozilla is working on a way to allow users, particularly enterprise users, to override its Add-ons blocklist.



InformationWeek has published an in-depth report on new software models. Download the report here (registration required).

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3407
Published: 2014-11-27
The SSL VPN implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(.2) and earlier does not properly allocate memory blocks during HTTP packet handling, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via crafted packets, aka Bug ID CSCuq68888.

CVE-2014-4829
Published: 2014-11-27
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security QRadar SIEM and QRadar Risk Manager 7.1 before MR2 Patch 9 and 7.2 before 7.2.4 Patch 1, and QRadar Vulnerability Manager 7.2 before 7.2.4 Patch 1, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests tha...

CVE-2014-4831
Published: 2014-11-27
IBM Security QRadar SIEM and QRadar Risk Manager 7.1 before MR2 Patch 9 and 7.2 before 7.2.4 Patch 1, and QRadar Vulnerability Manager 7.2 before 7.2.4 Patch 1, allow remote attackers to hijack sessions via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-4832
Published: 2014-11-27
IBM Security QRadar SIEM and QRadar Risk Manager 7.1 before MR2 Patch 9 and 7.2 before 7.2.4 Patch 1, and QRadar Vulnerability Manager 7.2 before 7.2.4 Patch 1, allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive cookie information by sniffing the network during an HTTP session.

CVE-2014-4883
Published: 2014-11-27
resolv.c in the DNS resolver in uIP, and dns.c in the DNS resolver in lwIP 1.4.1 and earlier, does not use random values for ID fields and source ports of DNS query packets, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cache-poisoning attacks via spoofed reply packets.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?