Vulnerabilities / Threats
10/28/2010
12:29 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
Repost This

Microsoft Windows Still Vulnerable To DLL Hijacking

Even patched applications aren't safe from bug, says ACROS security researcher.

Image Slideshow: Windows 7 Revealed
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: Windows 7 Revealed

Even patched Windows applications remain vulnerable to dynamic link library (DLL) hijacking -- aka DLL planting and DLL loading -- attacks due to the erratic way in which Windows attempts to load DLLs.

That warning comes from a security advisory released on Wednesday by ACROS Security.

How can attackers take advantage of the DLL vulnerability? According to Microsoft: "When an application dynamically loads a dynamic link library (DLL) without specifying a fully qualified path name, Windows tries to locate the DLL by searching a well-defined set of directories. If an attacker gains control of one of the directories, they can force the application to load a malicious copy of the DLL instead of the DLL that it was expecting." As a result, attackers can execute arbitrary code using the current user's access level.

To help developers code applications that avoid this DLL-hijacking vulnerability, Microsoft had released SetDllDirectory. This function allows developers to eliminate the current working directory from Windows DLL searches, to frustrate attackers who might otherwise use that directory to hide malicious DLL files.

But developers can't rely on SetDllDirectory, because it behaves erratically, at least on Windows XP Professional 32 bit, Windows Vista Business 32 and 64 bit, and Windows 7 Professional 32 bit, said Mitja Kolsek, CEO of Acros Security.

The issue is that Windows often botches relative file location searches. "Until Microsoft fixes this bug, any application that sets user or system path can unwittingly make your application vulnerable to binary planting if you're loading libraries from relative paths," he said. Furthermore, even when developers write absolute paths, Windows may still treat them as relative ones, or alter other important variables after users log off and log back in.

To help, Kolsek urged developers to "use absolute, fully qualified paths to DLLs when loading them." While that won't block every type of DLL-hijacking attack, it will mitigate many of them.

Note that Microsoft's current DLL-hijacking hotfix does still work, at least against certain types of attacks. "This hotfix successfully blocks DLL loads from the current working directory if configured properly, even if relative locations are found in the PATH," said Kolsek. That said, it will not block executable files from exploiting the DLL hijacking vulnerability. To date, according to Secunia, a vulnerability information provider, 211 applications are vulnerable to DLL-hijacking attacks. So far, however, only 25 have been patched.

Comment  | 
Email This  | 
Print  | 
RSS
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Video
All Videos
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2012-3946
Published: 2014-04-24
Cisco IOS before 15.3(2)S allows remote attackers to bypass interface ACL restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by sending IPv6 packets in an unspecified scenario in which expected packet drops do not occur for "a small percentage" of the packets, aka Bug ID CSCty73682.

CVE-2012-5723
Published: 2014-04-24
Cisco ASR 1000 devices with software before 3.8S, when BDI routing is enabled, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted (1) broadcast or (2) multicast ICMP packets with fragmentation, aka Bug ID CSCub55948.

CVE-2013-6738
Published: 2014-04-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM SmartCloud Analytics Log Analysis 1.1 and 1.2 before 1.2.0.0-CSI-SCALA-IF0003 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an invalid query parameter in a response from an OAuth authorization endpoint.

CVE-2014-0188
Published: 2014-04-24
The openshift-origin-broker in Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 2.0.5, 1.2.7, and earlier does not properly handle authentication requests from the remote-user auth plugin, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and impersonate arbitrary users via the X-Remote-User header in a request to...

CVE-2014-2391
Published: 2014-04-24
The password recovery service in Open-Xchange AppSuite before 7.2.2-rev20, 7.4.1 before 7.4.1-rev11, and 7.4.2 before 7.4.2-rev13 makes an improper decision about the sensitivity of a string representing a previously used but currently invalid password, which allows remote attackers to obtain potent...

Best of the Web