Vulnerabilities / Threats
9/23/2009
06:51 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft Posts Fix For SMB Vulnerability

A fix is available for the vulnerability in Microsoft's Sever Message Block software.

Microsoft on Tuesday posted a fix for a zero-day vulnerability in its Sever Message Block (SMB) software, a flaw that has been publicly known for about three weeks.

Microsoft posted a Security Advisory about the issue on September 8, the same day it released five Security Bulletins addressing other software vulnerabilities. The SMB vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute malicious code or conduct a denial of service attack.

The fix consists of a clickable link that will disable SMB v2. A link to re-enable it is also provided.

Microsoft is likely to issue a full patch during its October patch cycle. It may also address two other zero-day vulnerabilities in its IIS software that were made public at the beginning of the month.

Microsoft claims that the SMB vulnerability "was not responsibly disclosed," meaning the exploit code was published without sufficient prior notification to the company.

Laurent Graffie, who posted exploit code for the SMB2 vulnerability on September 7, acknowledges that his note to Microsoft may have gone astray -- he sent it to "microssoft.com" by mistake --but maintains that Microsoft knew about the flaw.

In comments posted with his exploit code, he points to a Microsoft spokeperson's comments in an article in Technology Review as evidence that the company was aware of the vulnerability at least as early as July.

According to the Microsoft spokesperson quoted in the article, Microsoft identified the vulnerability independently and fixed it in Windows 7 RTM (release to manufacturer) and Windows Server 2008 R2, which were released on July 22.

Graffie contends that "this specific bug (my payload) was introduced by a security patch (MS07-063)," a fix for another SMB vulnerability that was released in December 2007.


Attend this Windows 7 virtual event to gain exclusive access to our one-stop information destination, packed with resources to guide you in your decision-making process. Sept. 30, 2009. Find out more and register.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
DNS Threats: What Every Enterprise Should Know
Domain Name System exploits could put your data at risk. Here's some advice on how to avoid them.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.