Vulnerabilities / Threats
09:06 AM

Kelihos Botnet Thrives, Despite Takedowns

Fast flux infrastructure and Windows XP infections continue to keep the botnet alive.

Is the Kelihos botnet going bust?

Kaspersky Lab published research Tuesday that showed its sinkholing of one version of the Kelihos (a.k.a. Hlux) botnet 19 months ago with CrowdStrike, the Honeynet Project, and Dell SecureWorks -- as well as subsequent eradication efforts -- have led to a sharp decline in related botnet activity.

"What we see now is what we expected," Kaspersky Lab security researcher Stefan Ortloff wrote in a blog post. "The botnet is getting smaller and smaller -- victims have been disinfecting or reinstalling their PCs over time. At the moment we're counting about 1,000 unique bots on average per month," versus about 116,000 a year ago.

Ortloff said the vast majority of the botnet today is composed of malware-infected systems running Windows XP (86 percent), followed by Windows 7 (7 percent) and Windows Server 2008 R2 (4 percent). Forty-four percent of infected clients are in Poland.

[ Protect your servers without breaking the bank. See Don't Be A Hacker's Puppet. ]

But the Kaspersky Lab report triggered a sharp retort from Hendrik "Rick" Adrian of the white hat security research firm MalwareMustDie. He reported that, as of Wednesday, he was seeing 1,231 Kelihos infections coming just from Poland, placing it well behind the Ukraine (52,825), Russia (18,158), Japan (9,823), and India (6,037), among other countries. In total, Adrian -- part of the ongoing Op Kelihos takedown effort -- said he was seeing at least 100,848 active Kelihos infections as of Wednesday.

Have reports of the botnet's demise been exaggerated? Kaspersky Lab's Global Research and Analysis Team told us via email that the blog post referenced only a single version of Kelihos. "The blog post is a status update on the sinkholing operation we did with our partners in March 2012. We don't have any data or information which botnet in detail MalwareMustDie is referring to," the team wrote. "There are and were several versions of Hlux/Kelihos, some were sinkholed, but others may still be active."

Dave Dittrich, a SANS instructor and security researcher at the University of Washington, told us via email that the decline of the Kelihos strain that Kaspersky Lab helped sinkhole looks legit. "Kaspersky is watching a set of bots that were abandoned, and living for a year and a half is just about what I would have expected, having watched another similarly abandoned botnet (named 'Nugache') in 2008 slowly die out over about a 1.5 year period."

But other versions of Kelihos continue to circulate, he said, thanks in part to "pay per install" (a.k.a. malware-as-a-service) providers wielding malware such as Conficker, Fifesock, RedKit, and Virut.

According to Adrian, Kelihos eradication remains difficult because infected PCs can spread the infection to other PCs (peers) with which they connect, beyond the threat of users simply coming into contact with a Kelihos loader that would infect the system for the first time. "Each [of the] peers has more than 10+ payloads to spread, [and a] smaller number of payloads exists in the loader part."

Kelihos also continues to spread thanks to the botnet automatically creating command-and-control (CnC) domains, he said, as well as through fast flux techniques that hide the botnet's infrastructure behind multiple layers of proxies. From Aug. 6 through Nov. 12, the botnet had generated at least 800 domains via the Russian domain name registrar, including one that was registered Tuesday.

"The above growth is still happening, even now we keep on suspending, sinkholing new domains [that are] used for spreading [the] payload -- which [is] encrypted in their job servers to [the] CnC layer to be sent to [peers] for infection" upgrades, he said. "The effort of current [suppression] is not related [to] the previous shutdown." Rather, the current level of infections results from security researchers coordinating their efforts to continue researching how the botnet operates and sinkholing all related domains.

Who's behind these Kelihos infections? That's not clear, but a significant portion of the attack infrastructure traces to Russia. Last week, a Pastebin post from MalwareMustDie detailed a relationship between domains being used to serve Kelihos payloads and the RedKit exploit kit. A series of RedKit infections have included a JavaScript injection script that points the infected PC to a site based in Russia that uses "the same infrastructure as the Kelihos botnet," according to MalwareMustDie.

This year, attackers -- who might not be part of the Kelihos gang -- loaded the RedKit crimeware pack on to hacked NBC websites and launched driveby attacks exploiting known Java and Adobe Reader vulnerabilities against all site visitors. The exploit pack then installed Citadel financial malware on to vulnerable PCs.

Advanced persistent threats are evolving in motivation, malice, and sophistication. Are you ready to stop the madness? Also in the new, all-digital The Changing Face Of APTs issue of Dark Reading: Governments aren't the only victims of targeted intelligence gathering. Enterprises need to be on guard, too (free registration required).

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
11/18/2013 | 7:33:15 PM
Re: no surprise
We have some computers that run laser welders and cutters and they need to run XP. I was going to put these on the network but thought better of it for this reason. It's not worth the risk.
User Rank: Apprentice
11/18/2013 | 6:43:23 AM
Re: no surprise
I have been reading around for this Botnet, and could see that it's not too hard to spot, any one here who experianced malfunction due to this.
User Rank: Apprentice
11/18/2013 | 5:43:29 AM
Re: no surprise
@Paul -- Well put. The quantity of infected XP machines that make up the Kelihos botnet suggest how many of these vulnerable machines are out there, ripe for exploitation, as well as how attackers will continue to tap them as a free and relatively easy to harvest resource.
User Rank: Apprentice
11/17/2013 | 7:24:19 PM
no surprise
It's no surprise XP is the biggest target. There are many XP machines still out there and they will be major security holes for companies that continue to run them.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Dark Reading Tech Digest September 7, 2015
Some security flaws go beyond simple app vulnerabilities. Have you checked for these?
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
Published: 2015-10-02
Buffer overflow in Canary Labs Trend Web Server before 9.5.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted TCP packet.

Published: 2015-10-02
Cisco NX-OS 6.0(2)U6(0.46) on N3K devices allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (temporary SNMP outage) via an SNMP request for an OID that does not exist, aka Bug ID CSCuw36684.

Published: 2015-10-02
Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) 8.5.6-106 and 9.6.0-042 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (file-descriptor consumption and device reload) via crafted HTTP requests, aka Bug ID CSCuw32211.

Published: 2015-10-01
lxc-start in lxc before 1.0.8 and 1.1.x before 1.1.4 allows local container administrators to escape AppArmor confinement via a symlink attack on a (1) mount target or (2) bind mount source.

Published: 2015-10-01
kernel_crashdump in Apport before 2.19 allows local users to cause a denial of service (disk consumption) or possibly gain privileges via a (1) symlink or (2) hard link attack on /var/crash/vmcore.log.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
What can the information security industry do to solve the IoT security problem? Learn more and join the conversation on the next episode of Dark Reading Radio.