Vulnerabilities / Threats
3/24/2011
12:47 PM
50%
50%

Iran Fingered For Fraudulent Comodo SSL Certificates

Gmail, Hotmail, and Skype are among the domains affected by fraudulently obtained digital certificates, said Comodo.

10 Massive Security Breaches
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: 10 Massive Security Breaches
On Wednesday, digital certificate issuer Comodo released a security warning that its European affiliate had issued nine fraudulent SSL certificates. The certificates -- used by Web sites to confirm the identity of end users -- were issued without sufficient identity validation, and were apparently obtained by the government of Iran.

All certificates have been revoked by Comodo. They involve seven domains: Firefox extensions (addons.mozilla.org), Global Trustee, Gmail (mail.google.com), Google (www.google.com), Skype (login.skype.com), Windows Live including Hotmail (login.live.com), and Yahoo (login.yahoo.com -- 3 certificates).

Microsoft on Thursday said that as a result of the fraudulent SSL certificates, it had updated Windows to prevent them from being used. In addition, it said, "browsers which have enabled the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) will interactively validate these certificates and block them from being used."

What's the threat posed by real security certificates being issued to the wrong party? According to Microsoft, "these certificates may be used to spoof content, perform phishing attacks, or perform man-in-the-middle attacks against all Web browser users including users of Internet Explorer."

Or to gather intelligence. "If you are a government and able to control Internet routing within your country, you can reroute all, say, Skype users to [a] fake https://login.skype.com and collect their usernames and passwords, regardless of the SSL encryption seemingly in place," said Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at F-Secure, in a blog post."Or you can read their email when they go to Yahoo, Gmail, or Hotmail. Even most geeks wouldn't notice this was going on."

Who would try to obtain fraudulent certificates? Comodo says that circumstantial evidence points to a state-backed operation run by Iran, due to the speed and accuracy of the operation, as well as the focus. "The perpetrator has focused simply on the communication infrastructure -- not the financial infrastructure as a typical cyber-criminal might," according to Comodo's incident report.

More clues: The one attack seen so far that used the fraudulent certificates targeted an ISP in Iran. Furthermore, looking at all of the issued certificates, "the domains targeted would be of greatest use to a government attempting surveillance of Internet use by dissident groups," said Comodo's Phillip Hallam-Baker in a blog post.

Then again, it could be a diversion. "While the involvement of two IP addresses assigned to Iranian ISPs is suggestive of an origin, this may be the result of an attacker attempting to lay a false trail," he said. But on the other hand, "the perpetrator can only make use of these certificates if it had control of the DNS infrastructure."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Dark Reading Live EVENTS
INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
A Dark Reading Conference
While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: No, no, no! Have a Unix CRON do the pop-up reminders!
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
The Impact of a Security Breach 2017
The Impact of a Security Breach 2017
Despite the escalation of cybersecurity staffing and technology, enterprises continue to suffer data breaches and compromises at an alarming rate. How do these breaches occur? How are enterprises responding, and what is the impact of these compromises on the business? This report offers new data on the frequency of data breaches, the losses they cause, and the steps that organizations are taking to prevent them in the future.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.