Vulnerabilities / Threats
6/28/2013
09:27 AM
50%
50%

IE, Chrome Browser Attack Exploits Windows PCs

Microsoft says the social-engineering vulnerability, which uses "pop-under" browser notifications and a fake Captcha, isn't a Windows bug.

Warning: Browser security notification mechanisms can be abused by attackers to hide downloads, dismiss notifications and disguise malicious code execution.

Details of those vulnerabilities were recently presented by independent security researcher Rosario Valotta in a presentation titled "Abusing Browser User Interfaces for Fun and Profit" at last week's Nuit du Hack conference at Disneyland Paris, as well as other recent conferences in Amsterdam and Moscow.

Using the detailed vulnerabilities to create a related exploit is "ridiculously simple," and can be initiated "without any notification or user confirmation," Valotta said in a blog post. "All you need is to type one key on Internet Explorer or make one click on Google Chrome" for the exploit to succeed.

The detailed vulnerabilities begin with modern browsers using modeless notifications to alert users to such events as file downloads, plug-in installations or authorizing HTML5 privileged APIs. "These notifications bars are non-invasive, they are designed ... to inform users without interrupting navigation, but they suffer from some serious design problems," Valotta said.

[ Want to know which security practices give the best bang for your buck? Read Security ROI: 5 Practices Analyzed. ]

Notably, such notifications appear only in the related window or tab that generated them. "So if you are able to 'hide' the navigation window, you can hide also the notification, this means you can [as an example] download a file on your computer and have no notification at all from your browser," he said. In addition, even though these windows might be hidden, the notification is active, meaning that the screen will accept a keyboard shortcut -- for example to save a file or run a file.

Here's Valotta's attack scenario: A user visits a malicious website, which opens a pop-under window and begins downloading a malicious file. Pop-under windows -- they appear behind the active window -- can be created using JavaScript, for example via the cross-browser tool js-popunder, which is available for free from GitHub.

Getting that malicious file to execute, however, requires a bit of trickery, which is also known as social engineering. With Internet Explorer, for example, a user would have to be tricked into typing a required key -- "r" on English-language systems, to make a downloaded file run, or "e" on Italian systems, and so on -- which would in fact be transmitting the keystroke to the hidden, but active, pop-under window.

How might this be accomplished? "Well, there are plenty of ways: a game, a typing lesson," said Valotta. "But my favorite one is a Captcha. Just take a fake Captcha starting with the proper letter ("r" or "e") and you'll get 100% of tricked users."

While a letter must be typed to complete the exploit via IE, for Chrome browsers the requirement -- after the file has been downloaded -- is different. "You need to trick the victim into clicking on some link/button on the foreground window," said Valotta. "The attacker, using some [JavaScript], is able to track mouse pointer coordinates so -- as soon the mouse is hovering on the button -- the attacker can close the foreground window." Obviously, attackers would need to get their timing right.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
moarsauce123
50%
50%
moarsauce123,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/29/2013 | 5:55:50 PM
re: IE, Chrome Browser Attack Exploits Windows PCs
This is clearly a browser bug. As soon as a notification gets shown the window needs to be active and in the front. But is easier to blame others than fix the own flaws.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-5084
Published: 2015-08-02
The Siemens SIMATIC WinCC Sm@rtClient and Sm@rtClient Lite applications before 01.00.01.00 for Android do not properly store passwords, which allows physically approximate attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5352
Published: 2015-08-02
The x11_open_helper function in channels.c in ssh in OpenSSH before 6.9, when ForwardX11Trusted mode is not used, lacks a check of the refusal deadline for X connections, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a connection outside of the permitted time ...

CVE-2015-5537
Published: 2015-08-02
The SSL layer of the HTTPS service in Siemens RuggedCom ROS before 4.2.0 and ROX II does not properly implement CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3566.

CVE-2015-5600
Published: 2015-08-02
The kbdint_next_device function in auth2-chall.c in sshd in OpenSSH through 6.9 does not properly restrict the processing of keyboard-interactive devices within a single connection, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute-force attacks or cause a denial of service (CPU consumptio...

CVE-2015-1009
Published: 2015-07-31
Schneider Electric InduSoft Web Studio before 7.1.3.5 Patch 5 and Wonderware InTouch Machine Edition through 7.1 SP3 Patch 4 use cleartext for project-window password storage, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a file.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
What’s the future of the venerable firewall? We’ve invited two security industry leaders to make their case: Join us and bring your questions and opinions!