Vulnerabilities / Threats
02:19 PM
Connect Directly

Google-Sponsored Study Touts Chrome Security

Accuvant Lab's browser security study compared Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, and Microsoft Internet Explorer.

Firefox 8 Beta: Visual Tour
Firefox 8 Beta: Visual Tour
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
A Google-commissioned study has come to the conclusion that Google Chrome is, or was at the point in time when tests were conducted, "the Web browser that is most secured against attack."

Accuvant Labs, at Google's behest, compared Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, and Microsoft Internet Explorer. Rather than looking at vulnerability report counts and URL blacklists as ways to measure browser security, the company focused on account security architecture and anti-exploitation technology.

"[W]hile Google funded the research for this paper, Accuvant Labs was given a clear directive to provide readers with an objective understanding of relative browser security," the security company says in its report.

Researcher Joshua Drake said in an email that Apple's Safari browser wasn't included because the study focused on the most widely used browsers today, citing statistics compiled by

The versions tested were Chrome 12 and 13, Firefox 5.0.1, and Internet Explorer 9; tests were conducted in July, 2011, and do not reflect changes made since then.

[ Concerned about insider threats? Read How To Spot Malicious Insiders Before Data Theft. ]

Chrome, Firefox, and Internet Explorer each implement forms of anti-exploitation technology, but Accuvant suggests Chrome's protection methods are more complete than those used by the other two browser vendors. The firm says that Firefox falls short because doesn't yet support JIT hardening.

JIT (just-in-time) engines in Web browsers take code that has to be interpreted, like JavaScript, and converts it in memory to native binary code for execution. When this code produces predictable patterns, an attacker may be able to identify those patterns and alter the code maliciously. JIT hardening provides a way to mitigate such threats.

As for Internet Explorer, Accuvant suggests that its plug-in security and sandboxing architecture are less comprehensive than Chrome's.

Google is understandably pleased about Accuvant's findings. "We built Chrome with security as one of the core tenets and continue to work actively with the top minds in the security community," a company spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "We believe that many of the security approaches we've integrated into Chrome help to set it apart."

Johnathan Nightingale, Mozilla's director of Firefox engineering, meanwhile says his company is proud of its reputation for security and that security remains a central priority for Firefox. "Firefox includes a broad array of technologies to eliminate or reduce security threats, from platform-level features like address space randomization to internal systems like our layout frame poisoning system," he said in an email. "Sandboxing is a useful addition to that toolbox that we are investigating, but no technology is a silver bullet. We invest in security throughout the development process with internal and external code reviews, constant testing and analysis of running code, and rapid response to security issues when they emerge."

Microsoft didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

-- Thomas Claburn

Read our report on how to guard your systems from a SQL attack. Download the report now. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
12/9/2011 | 10:59:43 PM
re: Google-Sponsored Study Touts Chrome Security
For readers: NSS Labs says IE 9 is the best in terms of security; Accuvant says Chrome. Which browser do you think has the best approach?
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Dark Reading Tech Digest September 7, 2015
Some security flaws go beyond simple app vulnerabilities. Have you checked for these?
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
Published: 2015-10-12
vpxd in VMware vCenter Server 5.0 before u3e, 5.1 before u3, and 5.5 before u2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a long heartbeat message.

Published: 2015-10-12
The JMX RMI service in VMware vCenter Server 5.0 before u3e, 5.1 before u3b, 5.5 before u3, and 6.0 before u1 does not restrict registration of MBeans, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the RMI protocol.

Published: 2015-10-12
Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) B Blade Server Software 2.2.x before 2.2.6 allows local users to cause a denial of service (host OS or BMC hang) by sending crafted packets over the Inter-IC (I2C) bus, aka Bug ID CSCuq77241.

Published: 2015-10-12
The process-management implementation in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Expressway X8.5.2 allows local users to gain privileges by terminating a supervised process and then triggering the restart of a process by the root account, aka Bug ID CSCuv12272.

Published: 2015-10-12
HP 3PAR Service Processor SP 4.2.0.GA-29 (GA) SPOCC, SP 4.3.0.GA-17 (GA) SPOCC, and SP 4.3.0-GA-24 (MU1) SPOCC allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
What can the information security industry do to solve the IoT security problem? Learn more and join the conversation on the next episode of Dark Reading Radio.