Vulnerabilities / Threats
6/14/2012
02:31 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google, Facebook, Twitter, AOL Fight Badware

Tech giants, Internet Advertising Bureau, and StopBadware form the Ads Integrity Alliance to battle malicious advertising.

Google and Facebook may be cutthroat competitors but they share a common enemy: bad advertising. That's "bad" in the sense of harmful rather than ineffective or cringe-inducing. If enough Internet users start seeing online ads as a source of malware or as untrustworthy, they could take steps to block ads. That would be ruinous for revenue.

So it is that Google and Facebook, along with AOL, Twitter, and the Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) on Thursday joined with StopBadware to announce the formation of the Ads Integrity Alliance, an industry partnership to fight bad advertising.

Bad advertising includes malvertising--malware delivered via ads--and ads that deceive or violate policies.

The Ads Integrity Alliance aims to serve three primary functions: developing and sharing industry best practices; coordinating information sharing about those attempting to abuse online ad systems; and sharing trend data with regulators and law enforcement agencies.

[ ICANN's plan to approve new domain names spurs competition for desirable suffixes. Read New Domain Names Tempt Amazon, Google, Microsoft. ]

If you listen, you may be able to hear echoes of past industry ad security initiatives. Google was among the Internet companies that backed the formation of StopBadware in 2006, along with Sun Microsystems and Lenovo. Back then, there was more concern about adware: downloadable applications--the term had not yet been shorted to "app"--that presented unwanted ads and sometimes stole information.

The group was also concerned about spyware, software that collects personal information without the user's consent. That was before companies figured out that they could collect personal information with user consent by burying information collection practices in lengthy "privacy policies" and making acceptance of those policies a requirement for service usage.

In 2009, Google launched a website called Anti-Malvertising.com, a custom search engine and website to help its ad network partners identify potential providers of malicious advertisements. It also maintains a Google Groups mailing list called the DoubleClick Anti-Malvertising Group that posts alerts about websites hosting malware and ad networks distributing malicious ads.

In 2008, Google security engineer Niels Provos said in a blog post that about 2% of malicious websites were distributing malware through advertising, based on an analysis of about 2,000 known advertising networks. The company declined to update that particular metric but did post vaguely related figures last month.

Google says it disabled over 134 million ads and the accounts of over 824,000 advertisers for policy violations in 2011--so only a small subset of these ads carried malware. This is up sharply from 2010, when Google disabled 54.7 million ads and 248,000 advertiser accounts.

Nonetheless, Google insists its efforts are working. David W. Baker, director of engineering for Google's advertising group, said in a blog post last month that Google reduced the percentage of bad ads shown in 2011 to half what it was in 2010.

StopBadware did not provide specific figures about the prevalence of bad ads, but a spokesperson for the group said, "We speak daily to owners and administrators of compromised websites, and in our experience bad ads are almost exclusively the cause of site compromise on well-regarded, high-traffic websites."

The Enterprise 2.0 Conference brings together industry thought leaders to explore the latest innovations in enterprise social software, analytics, and big data tools and technologies. Learn how your business can harness these tools to improve internal business processes and create operational efficiencies. It happens in Boston, June 18-21. Register today!

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
6/16/2012 | 1:55:06 PM
re: Google, Facebook, Twitter, AOL Fight Badware
Twitter just bought Dasient I believe in January along the same lines. @ readers - Have malicious advertisements changed your surfing habits on the Web in any way?
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-4594
Published: 2014-10-25
The Payment for Webform module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.5 for Drupal does not restrict access by anonymous users, which allows remote anonymous users to use the payment of other anonymous users when submitting a form that requires payment.

CVE-2014-0476
Published: 2014-10-25
The slapper function in chkrootkit before 0.50 does not properly quote file paths, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse executable. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when /tmp is not mounted with the noexec option.

CVE-2014-1927
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly quote strings, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "$(" command-substitution sequences, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-1928....

CVE-2014-1928
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly escape characters, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "\" (backslash) characters to form multi-command sequences, a different vulner...

CVE-2014-1929
Published: 2014-10-25
python-gnupg 0.3.5 and 0.3.6 allows context-dependent attackers to have an unspecified impact via vectors related to "option injection through positional arguments." NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-7323.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.