Vulnerabilities / Threats
3/25/2010
05:04 PM
50%
50%

CEOs Paying Attention To Security, Study Says

CIO is the person most frequently held responsible for data protection, Ponemon survey says

Top-level executives are beginning to grasp the importance of security, according to a study published today.

Eighty-one percent of C-level executives think that investing in a security strategy can greatly reduce or mitigate the risk of data loss or theft, according to the survey of 115 C-level executives in the U.K. conducted by Ponemon Institute and sponsored by IBM.

"In the face of growing security threats, business leaders are finally recognizing that a strong data protection strategy plays a critical role to their bottom line," says Dr. Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of Ponemon Institute. "Today, C-level executives believe the cost savings from investing in a data protection program is substantially higher than the estimated value of recovering from a breach."

Seventy-seven percent of C-level executives reported that their organizations have experienced a data breach at some point, while all respondents disclosed that they have had their data attacked in the past 12 months. Seventy-six percent think that reducing potential security flaws within business-critical applications is the most important aspect of their data protection programs.

C-level executives believe good data protection practices can support important organizational goals, such as compliance, reputation management, and customer trust. Only a small percentage of the CEOs surveyed, just 18 percent, are very confident that their organizations will not suffer a data breach within the next year.

Executives in the study estimated the average data breach cost per compromised record at about $250. CEOs estimated that cost to be closer to $300 per compromised record.

Three-quarters of respondents reported that one person is considered to be in charge of data protection for their organizations. That person is considered by most to be the CIO -- especially by the CEO.

More than half (51 percent) of C-level executives believe the purpose of data protection programs is to increase brand or marketplace image.

"We are witnessing C-level executives implement security strategies at a much higher rate than ever before," said Daniel Sabbah, general manager of IBM Rational.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-2027
Published: 2015-03-31
eGroupware before 1.8.006.20140217 allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks, delete arbitrary files, and possibly execute arbitrary code via the (1) addr_fields or (2) trans parameter to addressbook/csv_import.php, (3) cal_fields or (4) trans parameter to calendar/csv_import.p...

CVE-2014-2830
Published: 2015-03-31
Stack-based buffer overflow in cifskey.c or cifscreds.c in cifs-utils before 6.4, as used in pam_cifscreds, allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

CVE-2014-7876
Published: 2015-03-31
Unspecified vulnerability in HP Integrated Lights-Out (iLO) firmware 2 before 2.27 and 4 before 2.03 and iLO Chassis Management (CM) firmware before 1.30 allows remote attackers to gain privileges, execute arbitrary code, or cause a denial of service via unknown vectors.

CVE-2014-9462
Published: 2015-03-31
The _validaterepo function in sshpeer in Mercurial before 3.2.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted repository name in a clone command.

CVE-2014-9706
Published: 2015-03-31
The build_index_from_tree function in index.py in Dulwich before 0.9.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a commit with a directory path starting with .git/, which is not properly handled when checking out a working tree.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Good hackers--aka security researchers--are worried about the possible legal and professional ramifications of President Obama's new proposed crackdown on cyber criminals.