Vulnerabilities / Threats
3/19/2013
02:14 PM
50%
50%

Beware Smartphone Lurkers: Cloud Storage File Remnants

Security investigators recovered Box, Dropbox and SugarSync files and unique file IDs, via forensic dump of iPhone and Android smartphone memory.

What are the implications of these findings? As more people use smartphones, digital forensic investigators -- including police departments and law enforcement agencies -- are increasingly looking at such devices to recover usable evidence. Last year, for example, police in London announced that they were testing mobile phone data extraction devices to allow specialist teams to access, study and save any data stored on a suspect's mobile device. In the future, however, they may need to study not one device, but many, given the extent to which many people now own multiple devices.

On that front, the Glasgow researchers said they're now continuing their study to cross-reference forensic examinations of multiple devices used by the same person. "The very nature of the cloud environment encourages users to access data through multiple devices," they said, noting that they already have an experiment underway "to access residual artifacts from Gmail, Mozy, Ubuntu One and Evernote on end devices connected to these services." Their question is whether conducting a forensic analysis of multiple devices used by the same user will yield a greater number of recoverable files and artifacts.

"The first step was to say, is this an idea that's going to work, then we can say, in future research, how do we use this data to say something useful for a forensic investigator, in terms of merging evidence from different proxies into a single data set?" said paper co-author Tim Storer, speaking by phone. For example, if part of an Excel spreadsheet is found on one device, but not another two devices used by the same user, should it count as evidence? "There's often a tendency by forensic investigators to conflate data and evidence," he said, when a higher threshold is called for.

Going forward, the researchers said in their paper that they hope to detail "the data leakage risk that cloud applications introduce to corporate environments" in greater detail, as well as to "propose a set of security measures for both cloud providers and smartphone users to mitigate the potential risk of data leakage."

"These services are being used in corporate environments more and more ... so it's a potential source of risk for an organization," said Storer. "Sensitive documents may end up on someone's device that's subject to analysis." But businesses might minimize those types of risks by steering their employees to use devices from which it's more difficult to recover usable information, forensically speaking. Likewise, cloud service providers could offer their corporate customers specialized services that scrubbed all data stored by their mobile apps, once a user no longer needed to view it.

Previous
2 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Andrew Hornback
50%
50%
Andrew Hornback,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/22/2013 | 4:28:13 AM
re: Beware Smartphone Lurkers: Cloud Storage File Remnants
From my point of view, this makes the use of an appropriate MDM solution all that much more important in an organization with a BYOD policy that also leverages these kinds of cloud services. Being able to do a full out "device nuke" in the event of a device loss becomes critical in light of these findings.

Andrew Hornback
InformationWeek Contributor
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-1421
Published: 2014-11-25
mountall 1.54, as used in Ubuntu 14.10, does not properly handle the umask when using the mount utility, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-3605
Published: 2014-11-25
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6407. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-6407. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6407 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to pre...

CVE-2014-6093
Published: 2014-11-25
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Portal 7.0.x before 7.0.0.2 CF29, 8.0.x through 8.0.0.1 CF14, and 8.5.x before 8.5.0 CF02 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.

CVE-2014-6196
Published: 2014-11-25
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Web Experience Factory (WEF) 6.1.5 through 8.5.0.1, as used in WebSphere Dashboard Framework (WDF) and Lotus Widget Factory (LWF), allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by leveraging a Dojo builder error in an unspecified WebSp...

CVE-2014-7247
Published: 2014-11-25
Unspecified vulnerability in JustSystems Ichitaro 2008 through 2011; Ichitaro Government 6, 7, 2008, 2009, and 2010; Ichitaro Pro; Ichitaro Pro 2; Ichitaro 2011 Sou; Ichitaro 2012 Shou; Ichitaro 2013 Gen; and Ichitaro 2014 Tetsu allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?