Vulnerabilities / Threats
2/27/2007
07:45 AM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

A Hacker by Any Other Name

Black hat? Gray hat? Carder? Cracker? Putting a name on today's hacker is no simple task

5:45 PM -- Okay, confession time. I've been the site editor for a security news portal for almost a year now, and I still don't know the politically correct way to refer to a hacker.

It's not for lack of trying. In fact, I've been working on this stuff for more than 20 years. I remember when I wrote about the Milwaukee 414 gang back in 1984, several people got mad at me for calling them "hackers" and not "crackers." I've read books. I've talked to people, including some of those who started the whole phenomenon. I just finished a survey of 116 people who break into computer systems on a regular basis. (See Five Myths About Black Hats.)

I still can't figure it out.

So let me ask you, the most intelligent readership in the land, if you can help me. I'll describe each of these terms as I understand them, and you tell me where I'm wrong. One warning, though: if I get lots of disagreement from you, we're going to change our style and just call everybody "Bruce."

A hacker, as I understand it, is anyone who tries to break into computer systems to see if they can do it. The "hacker's code" says that if you're successful in breaking in, you should do no harm. So, technically, anyone that penetrates computer systems and makes changes or steals data is not a hacker.

A black hat is someone who breaks into computer systems for malicious purposes, including theft, destruction of data, or denial of service. If a hacker uses his knowledge of systems penetration to do something bad to a computer system, then he is said to be "wearing his black hat." Black hats are sometimes called attackers.

A white hat is someone who breaks into computer systems to show how it can be done, revealing security vulnerabilities in order to help eliminate them. Most white hats swear they will never do anything to hurt the data they access, but occasionally some of them do malicious things, just to prove they can. These are called gray hats.

A carder is someone who penetrates computer systems with the express purpose of collecting credit card data, which can be used to buy things or sold to criminals who want to use the data to steal from stores or individuals.

A cracker is someone who breaks a code, such as a user password or an encryption scheme.

A security researcher is anyone who seeks out vulnerabilities in computer systems, for good or evil purposes.

There are probably several terms I'm forgetting here, but these are the main ones I run across every day. As near as I can figure, only two of these terms always apply to ethical people: "hacker," a word whose true meaning (and ethical code) is frequently overlooked by the general public; and "white hat." Only one of these terms always applies to a bad person: "carder," who is virtually always dealing with stolen data.

Black hats, attackers, crackers, gray hats, and security researchers can swing either way. They could be good people performing research, exploits or attacks to expose vulnerabilities and prove flaws; or they could be criminals looking to expose and exploit vulnerabilities for their own purposes.

In my research for our black hat survey, I was puzzled by some of the results, because while most of the respondents said they attempt to break into computer systems for fun or profit, almost half of them agreed with the statement that "unauthorized access to computer information is never okay." While almost all of those we interviewed had some knowledge of systems penetration, many of them were inconsistent as to whether they should be called "hackers," "black hats," or "white hats."

As an editor who's sensitive to labels and political correctness, I'd like to use the right name when I talk about people who try to break into corporate computer systems. Often, though, I'm not sure whether to call them "attackers," "hackers," or "hey you."

Who can give me some guidance on this? If you've got a thought, please post it to the message board attached to this story. If you haven't used our boards before, you'll have to register, but I promise it's easy and quick. And when you get on there, you can call me "Tim" or "Enchanter" or "Bozo."

Just don't call me late for dinner.

— Tim "Bruce" Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-3304
Published: 2014-10-30
Directory traversal vulnerability in Dell EqualLogic PS4000 with firmware 6.0 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the default URI.

CVE-2013-7409
Published: 2014-10-30
Buffer overflow in ALLPlayer 5.6.2 through 5.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string in a .m3u (playlist) file.

CVE-2014-3446
Published: 2014-10-30
SQL injection vulnerability in wcm/system/pages/admin/getnode.aspx in BSS Continuity CMS 4.2.22640.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the nodeid parameter.

CVE-2014-3584
Published: 2014-10-30
The SamlHeaderInHandler in Apache CXF before 2.6.11, 2.7.x before 2.7.8, and 3.0.x before 3.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted SAML token in the authorization header of a request to a JAX-RS service.

CVE-2014-3623
Published: 2014-10-30
Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.x before 2.0.2, as used in Apache CXF 2.7.x before 2.7.13 and 3.0.x before 3.0.2, when using TransportBinding, does properly enforce the SAML SubjectConfirmation method security semantics, which allows remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks via unspecified vect...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.