Vulnerabilities / Threats
1/4/2011
12:56 PM
Paul McDougall
Paul McDougall
Commentary
50%
50%

7 Ways To Save Microsoft In 2011

If Redmond can't adapt to the most competitive landscape in decades, it will fall further behind Apple and Google in key growth markets like phones and tablets.

2010 started with a bang for Microsoft. The company was riding the momentum from its Windows 7 launch the previous October, CEO Steve Ballmer commanded the stage at the Consumer Electronics Show to tout Microsoft's tablet plans, and its introduction of the KIN social networking phones promised to restore the company's place in the mobile market and capture a new generation of users.

Cue the whimper. After 12 months, Windows 7 is selling well, but the real buzz in operating systems has been stolen by Google, which this year will introduce a series of potentially game-changing netbooks powered by its Chrome OS. Windows-based tablets are almost nowhere to be seen, and the KIN died an early death amid abysmal sales. With those challenges in mind, here are seven strategies Microsoft must pursue this year to restore its cred.

Phones, phones, phones. Ballmer must pull out the stops and establish his company as a legitimate contender in smartphones. Microsoft launched Windows Phone 7 with a big marketing campaign in October, but early sales numbers indicate it has more work to do. About 1.5 million Windows Phone 7 handsets, from vendors like HTC, Dell, and Samsung, shipped in the operating system's first six weeks on the market, according to Microsoft. Not bad, but it's not enough to cause Steve Jobs to lose sleep.

Apple's iPhone sold 3 million units in just three weeks during its debut period. Ballmer must use all of Microsoft's remaining clout with retailers, channel partners, and OEMs to push Windows Phone 7 devices to the forefront. Otherwise, the company could become an also-ran in a category that Gartner predicts will represent the dominant computing platform by 2013, when there will be 600 million units deployed worldwide.

Produce a genuine tablet OS. Similarly, Microsoft is very late to hardware's other key growth market: tablets. Apple still rules with the iPad and will introduce an even slicker version in the coming months. Google, meanwhile, is fast becoming a player with Android-based devices from Samsung, Dell, and others.

Microsoft has been AWOL, and it didn't help when HP ditched plans for a Windows 7-based slate in favor of tablets that run its own Palm WebOS software. That should have been Microsoft's first clue that it needs to produce a true tablet OS instead of trying to shoehorn Windows 7 into a new form factor. PC operating systems are too slow and bulky for the tablet market, which demands instant-on and flawless touch screen capabilities. Microsoft's best bet: Develop a version of Windows Phone 7 geared for tablet needs.

Make Windows cheaper, or free. One way for Microsoft to fend off encroachments by Google and Apple into the desktop is to radically change the way it prices Windows. The company currently charges up to $319 for a boxed version of Windows 7 and licenses it to PC makers for anywhere between $50 and $100 per unit for preinstalled versions.

It's a good business – Microsoft generated about $12.9 billion in Windows OEM sales alone in calendar 2009. But it won't last.

Google is now looking to use its success in the cloud and in mobile to assail Microsoft's core desktop market, and it's offering Chrome OS virtually for free to OEMs. That means computer makers can charge a lot less for a Chrome-based machine than one that runs Windows, and pass the savings on to customers. Google recognizes that the real money to be made going forward is in online services like search, advertising, geolocation, and social networking, and that in the cloud age the OS is nothing more than a gateway to those services.

Consumers and businesses are already catching on and want less client and more cloud. Microsoft needs to respond by drastically lowering the price it charges end users and OEMs for Windows licenses.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading Tech Digest, Dec. 19, 2014
Software-defined networking can be a net plus for security. The key: Work with the network team to implement gradually, test as you go, and take the opportunity to overhaul your security strategy.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2011-4720
Published: 2014-12-27
Hillstone HS TFTP Server 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a long filename in a (1) RRQ or (2) WRQ operation.

CVE-2012-1203
Published: 2014-12-27
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in starnet/index.php in SyndeoCMS 3.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add user accounts via a save_user action.

CVE-2013-4663
Published: 2014-12-27
git_http_controller.rb in the redmine_git_hosting plugin for Redmine allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in (1) the service parameter to info/refs, related to the get_info_refs function or (2) the reqfile argument to the file_exists function.

CVE-2013-4793
Published: 2014-12-27
The update function in umbraco.webservices/templates/templateService.cs in the TemplateService component in Umbraco CMS before 6.0.4 does not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary ASP.NET code via a crafted SOAP request.

CVE-2013-5958
Published: 2014-12-27
The Security component in Symfony 2.0.x before 2.0.25, 2.1.x before 2.1.13, 2.2.x before 2.2.9, and 2.3.x before 2.3.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a long password that triggers an expensive hash computation, as demonstrated by a PBKDF2 computation, a si...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join us Wednesday, Dec. 17 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to hear what employers are really looking for in a chief information security officer -- it may not be what you think.