Vulnerabilities / Threats
3/16/2017
05:15 PM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Quick Hits
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

US-CERT Warns That HTTPS Inspection Tools Weaken TLS

Turns out that man-in-the-middling your own traffic isn't the safest way to look for man-in-the-middle attacks.

HTTPS inspection tools are, in essence, a security team's authorized man-in-the-middle attacker: they intercept encrypted SSL/TLS traffic, in order to, for example, search it for malware that uses HTTPS to connect to malicious servers. However, in an alert today, US-CERT warned that HTTPS interception weakens TLS security, advising that organizations "carefully consider the pros and cons of such products before implementing."

Normally, a Web browser will alert a user to weak ciphers, deprecated protocol versions, or other reasons that certificates should not be trusted and connections might be dangerous. Once an HTTPS interception tool is introduced, however, the user must put all its trust in the tool.

From the US-CERT alert:

"Because the HTTPS inspection product manages the protocols, ciphers, and certificate chain, the product must perform the necessary HTTPS validations. Failure to perform proper validation or adequately convey the validation status increases the probability that the client will fall victim to MiTM attacks by malicious third parties."

Unfortunately, researchers have found these products lacking when it comes to those validation practices. For example - as noted in works cited in the advisory, "The Risks of SSL Inspection" and "The Security Impact of HTTPS Interception" - some HTTPS inspection products do incomplete validation of upstream certificates, others conduct complete validation but fail to convey the results back to the client, and others will complete communication to the target server before issuing warnings to the user.   

HTTPS interception capabilities are built into a wide variety of security tools, including firewalls, secure web gateways, data loss prevention products, and other applications. A partial list of potentially affected applications is available here

US-CERT recommends that organizations use the testing resources at BadSSL.com to determine whether or not their HTTPS interception applications are properly validating certificates and preventing connections to sites using weak cryptography.

"At a minimum," states the alert, "if any of the tests in the Certificate section of badssl.com prevent a client with direct Internet access from connecting, those same clients should also refuse the connection when connected to the Internet by way of an HTTPS inspection product." 

 

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 5 / 5
rayray2016
50%
50%
rayray2016,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/7/2017 | 12:56:33 AM
Twenty Motion
awesome post. thanks for sharing
ameliamartin
50%
50%
ameliamartin,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/6/2017 | 10:27:38 PM
Re: web example
I agreed The https connection by itself is helpless
ameliamartin
50%
50%
ameliamartin,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/6/2017 | 10:26:28 PM
Re: buy instagram followers web example
I agreed that https connection by itself helpless
ameliamartin
50%
50%
ameliamartin,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/6/2017 | 10:24:15 PM
Re: forskolin reviewsphen375 reviewphenq review web example
I shall be very thankful for valuable info
Plumber
50%
50%
Plumber,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/6/2017 | 12:40:38 PM
Re: sagescapes.com www.sagescapes.com
You're absolutely right.
ameliamartin
50%
50%
ameliamartin,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/5/2017 | 1:49:04 PM
Re: forskolin reviewsphen375 reviewphenq review web example
The https connection by itself is helpless if there are resources from the website that are still connecting to the http version of the website
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
3/17/2017 | 11:50:10 AM
Analysis
The difficulty in assessing the risk for this alert is that the issues lies with the process. A specific exposure factor via vulnerable software or configurations is not applicable and instead you need to review the mechanisms utilized for HTTPS inspection to monitor for bad behavior. There is a list provided to help hone down the possiblilities but not a method for which to scan for vulnerable devices.
<<   <   Page 5 / 5
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This is a secure windows pc.
Current Issue
Security Operations and IT Operations: Finding the Path to Collaboration
A wide gulf has emerged between SOC and NOC teams that's keeping both of them from assuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of IT systems. Here's how experts think it should be bridged.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
In past years, security researchers have discovered ways to hack cars, medical devices, automated teller machines, and many other targets. Dark Reading Executive Editor Kelly Jackson Higgins hosts researcher Samy Kamkar and Levi Gundert, vice president of threat intelligence at Recorded Future, to discuss some of 2016's most unusual and creative hacks by white hats, and what these new vulnerabilities might mean for the coming year.