Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/4/2019
05:20 PM
Robert Lemos
Robert Lemos
News
50%
50%

Third Parties in Spotlight as More Facebook Data Leaks

Two third-party services left Facebook user data exposed online -- in one case, 540 million records of user comments -- highlighting the ease with which third-party developers can access data and the risk of lax security.

A Mexican media company's unprotected Amazon S3 container exposed more than 540 million records of Facebook users' comments and interests, while a defunct integrated Facebook app, At the Pool, left online sensitive information of more than 22,000 users, cloud-security firm UpGuard announced on April 3.

The data, found by the company's storage-scanning service, had explicitly been saved in two separate Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) buckets, allowing public downloading, according to a blog post. The larger data set, left online by Mexican media firm Cultura Colectiva, consisted of 146GB of comments and whether other users liked or responded to those posts, says Chris Vickery, director of cyber-risk research at UpGuard.

"In this concentrated mass, 540 million records, this is the same type of data that companies like Cambridge Analytica, or anyone else in the marketing [or] psychographic field, can exploit to develop … profiles and really learn how to control a population," he says. "In the aggregate, it is scary."

Third-party developers and corporate users of Facebook's information have become a large security and public-relations problem for the company. In 2018, a Facebook insider revealed that Cambridge Analytica and its parent company, the SCL Group, had collected data on millions of Americans as a prelude to profiling them and targeting advertising to influence the 2016 presidential election. Soon after, the company revealed that most of its users likely had had their profiles scraped by third-party developers. Multiple lawsuits have since been filed against Facebook.

Yet the leaks have not stopped. In December, an issue with Facebook's photo API may have given third-party developers access to the photos of 6.8 million users. In June, Facebook revealed that a bug had inadvertently set the profiles of 14 million users to "public."

The run of privacy and security issues underscores the lack of control Facebook has over the application developers who use the company's data to create new services. In a statement to Dark Reading, Facebook stressed that the servers exposing the latest data did not belong to the company.

"Facebook's policies prohibit storing Facebook information in a public database," a spokesperson said in a statement. "Once alerted to the issue, we worked with Amazon to take down the databases. We are committed to working with the developers on our platform to protect people's data.”

Often, the leaks are not due to any sophisticated attack but by a misconfiguration on the part of the third-party firms. Amazon S3 instances are secure by default and have to be explicitly set to allow public downloading, according to UpGuard's Vickery.

"In each case, the Facebook platform facilitated the collection of data about individuals and its transfer to third parties, who became responsible for its security," UpGuard stated in its blog post. "The surface area for protecting the data of Facebook users is thus vast and heterogenous, and the responsibility for securing it lies with millions of app developers who have built on its platform."

Such misconfiguration should be easily detected by the firms. Scanning services, automated developer testing tools, and other techniques could be used to detect such issues, says Renaud Deraison, chief technology officer and co-founder of Tenable, a cyber defense firm.

"We continue to see headline-grabbing data leaks and breaches that are the direct result of a simple misconfiguration," he says. "And we'll continue to see these issues so long as speed trumps security."

While the company has pushed much of the responsibility for the data exposures to the third-party custodians of the data, Facebook needs to step up, Mukul Kumar, chief information security officer and vice president of cyber practice at security-management firm Cavirin, said in a statement.

"Facebook and others need to go through their records, and reach out to their various partners to secure any customer data," he said. "Given that some of these partners may not have the expertise or may no longer exist, Facebook may need to work directly with the public cloud providers, and if they don't take the initiative, the government should intervene."

Related Content:

 

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
4/10/2019 | 10:47:24 AM
On Facebook
It has reached the point where anything you put on it IS COMPROMISED - not a question of if or when but IT IS AND THAT'S THAT so only control mechanism is (a) delete account or (b) monitor and scrub any personal data you have on it.  This includes the idiotic posts people make when they are ON VACATION and leave their home empty.  If I were a thief, that is a grand source of data for robbery.  Family members and children also suspect.  Events in life - ALL of this IS compromised and don't complain about it.  Either scrub or delete account, it's that simple. 

Update; i deleted all group memberships save one so that social interests cannot be monitored and passwords guessed from terms within.  I had about 30 groups!!   Wiped them all out save one.  

 
Russia Hacked Clinton's Computers Five Hours After Trump's Call
Robert Lemos, Technology Journalist/Data Researcher,  4/19/2019
Why We Need a 'Cleaner Internet'
Darren Anstee, Chief Technology Officer at Arbor Networks,  4/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-18643
PUBLISHED: 2019-04-25
GitLab CE & EE 11.2 and later and before 11.5.0-rc12, 11.4.6, and 11.3.10 have Persistent XSS.
CVE-2018-19359
PUBLISHED: 2019-04-25
GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 8.9 and later and before 11.5.0-rc12, 11.4.6, and 11.3.10 has Incorrect Access Control.
CVE-2019-11488
PUBLISHED: 2019-04-25
Incorrect Access Control in the Account Access / Password Reset Link in SimplyBook.me Enterprise before 2019-04-23 allows Unauthorized Attackers to READ/WRITE Customer or Administrator data via a persistent HTTP GET Request Hash Link Replay, as demonstrated by a login-link from the browser history.
CVE-2019-11489
PUBLISHED: 2019-04-25
Incorrect Access Control in the Administrative Management Interface in SimplyBook.me Enterprise before 2019-04-23 allows Authenticated Low-Priv Users to Elevate Privileges to Full Admin Rights via a crafted HTTP PUT Request, as demonstrated by modified JSON data to a /v2/rest/ URI.
CVE-2019-3720
PUBLISHED: 2019-04-25
Dell EMC Open Manage System Administrator (OMSA) versions prior to 9.3.0 contain a Directory Traversal Vulnerability. A remote authenticated malicious user with admin privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to the file system by exploiting insufficient san...