Perimeter
1/18/2011
12:40 PM
Commentary
Commentary
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
Repost This

The Relative Risk Of Malware

Trend Micro reports there are 3.5 new malware released every second, up from 1 new malware every 1.5 seconds a year ago. But what's your actual risk?

Throughout 2010, Trend Micro published figures stating there was 1 new malware threat every 1.5 seconds. Just last week, a blogger interpreted that as being at personal risk of encountering a whopping 19,200 new threats per day (based on eight hours of online time).

Earlier today, Trend Micro upped that figure substantially, twittering that 3.5 new threats were released every second -- a 450% increase. With the wrong interpretation, some might believe that translates to an individual encounter risk of 100,800 new threats per day (based on that same eight hours of online time).

Obviously whether it's actually 1 new threat per 1.5 seconds, or 3.5 new threats per second, neither translates to actual encounter risk for users. To gauge that risk, you'd have to monitor the same user population for an extended period of time and determine what the actual number of raw encounters was at specified, regular intervals.

Fortunately, ScanSafe (now Cisco ScanSafe) has been doing that since May 2007, so we can report on the actual encounter rates. Our user population is a 15,000-seat enterprise; following are the actual numbers of malware encountered:

>> May 2007: 205 encounters
>> May 2008: 669 encounters
>> May 2009: 1,719 encounters
>> May 2010: 4,111 encounters

In other words, if you're a 15,000-seat enterprise, then you probably average 5.5 malware encounters per day. That's still a lot, but it's definitely a lot less than 3.5 every second. The moral of the story: The overall rate of new malware does not equal the overall rate of encounter.

Mary Landesman is an antivirus professional and senior security researcher for ScanSafe, now part of Cisco. In 2009 she was awarded a Microsoft MVP for her work in consumer security.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2011-3154
Published: 2014-04-17
DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeViewKDE.py in Update Manager before 1:0.87.31.1, 1:0.134.x before 1:0.134.11.1, 1:0.142.x before 1:0.142.23.1, 1:0.150.x before 1:0.150.5.1, and 1:0.152.x before 1:0.152.25.5 does not properly create temporary files, which allows local users to obtain the XAUTHORITY file conte...

CVE-2013-2143
Published: 2014-04-17
The users controller in Katello 1.5.0-14 and earlier, and Red Hat Satellite, does not check authorization for the update_roles action, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges by setting a user account to an administrator account.

CVE-2014-0036
Published: 2014-04-17
The rbovirt gem before 0.0.24 for Ruby uses the rest-client gem with SSL verification disabled, which allows remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-0054
Published: 2014-04-17
The Jaxb2RootElementHttpMessageConverter in Spring MVC in Spring Framework before 3.2.8 and 4.0.0 before 4.0.2 does not disable external entity resolution, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, cause a denial of service, and conduct CSRF attacks via crafted XML, aka an XML External ...

CVE-2014-0071
Published: 2014-04-17
PackStack in Red Hat OpenStack 4.0 does not enforce the default security groups when deployed to Neutron, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and make unauthorized connections.

Best of the Web