Vulnerabilities / Threats

5/18/2016
11:10 AM
50%
50%

Survey: Customers Lose Trust In Brands After A Data Breach

Survey by FireEye highlights customer reluctance to continue with service providers with weak cybersecurity.

The average customer worries more about cybersecurity than companies believe -- and the cost of a data breach is much more than meets the eye. That was the verdict of a market poll commissioned recently by cybersecurity provider FireEye on growing public concerns regarding data privacy.

The survey was conducted among US consumers by independent technology market research specialist Vanson Bourne. Around 2000 adults were interviewed within the US in April. 

Emerging themes include the fact that consumers are likely to be less trusting of major brands that have suffered a large breach and in the case of case of personally experiencing a breach, 90 percent of repondents said they would want to be informed within 24 hours.

Of those interviewed, 76 percent said they would move away from companies with a high record of data breaches while 72 percent said they will now “share fewer personal details with companies”.

This stance is likely to hit businesses of entities like search engines and social media platforms that are dependent on collecting consumer data for advertisers, says FireEye.

For complete details of the survey, click here.                               

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2016 | 10:16:37 AM
Re: Growing awareness
"One other reference point in one survey (KPMG, Feb 2016) was that a huge majority of procurement managers surveyed would consider removing a breached supplier from their rosters"

That's interesting to note. Vendors/third parties can affect ones brand reputation as well. Also, depending on how a company interacts with a third party, that third parties security shortcomings can become a monumental risk to the organization to which they provide service.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2016 | 10:12:45 AM
Indirect Cost
Brand reputation loss is an indirect cost of a breach. Though difficult to measure in dollars, it can be more detrimental to a company then direct costs from a breach.
Vertices
50%
50%
Vertices,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/23/2016 | 9:21:01 AM
Growing awareness
Recent studies in the UK also show broadly similar statistics. One other reference point in one survey (KPMG, Feb 2016) was that a huge majority of procurement managers surveyed would consider removing a breached supplier from their rosters. Sobering.

PerfectCobalt
Election Websites, Back-End Systems Most at Risk of Cyberattack in Midterms
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/14/2018
Intel Reveals New Spectre-Like Vulnerability
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/15/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-13435
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-16
** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in the LINE jp.naver.line application 8.8.0 for iOS. The Passcode feature allows authentication bypass via runtime manipulation that forces a certain method to disable passcode authentication. NOTE: the vendor indicates that this is not an attack of interest w...
CVE-2018-13446
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-16
** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in the LINE jp.naver.line application 8.8.1 for Android. The Passcode feature allows authentication bypass via runtime manipulation that forces a certain method's return value to true. In other words, an attacker could authenticate with an arbitrary passcode. ...
CVE-2018-14567
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-16
libxml2 2.9.8, if --with-lzma is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted XML file that triggers LZMA_MEMLIMIT_ERROR, as demonstrated by xmllint, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8035 and CVE-2018-9251.
CVE-2018-15122
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-16
An issue found in Progress Telerik JustAssembly through 2018.1.323.2 and JustDecompile through 2018.2.605.0 makes it possible to execute code by decompiling a compiled .NET object (such as DLL or EXE) with an embedded resource file by clicking on the resource.
CVE-2018-11509
PUBLISHED: 2018-08-16
ASUSTOR ADM 3.1.0.RFQ3 uses the same default root:admin username and password as it does for the NAS itself for applications that are installed from the online repository. This may allow an attacker to login and upload a webshell.