Vulnerabilities / Threats
5/18/2016
11:10 AM
50%
50%

Survey: Customers Lose Trust In Brands After A Data Breach

Survey by FireEye highlights customer reluctance to continue with service providers with weak cybersecurity.

The average customer worries more about cybersecurity than companies believe -- and the cost of a data breach is much more than meets the eye. That was the verdict of a market poll commissioned recently by cybersecurity provider FireEye on growing public concerns regarding data privacy.

The survey was conducted among US consumers by independent technology market research specialist Vanson Bourne. Around 2000 adults were interviewed within the US in April. 

Emerging themes include the fact that consumers are likely to be less trusting of major brands that have suffered a large breach and in the case of case of personally experiencing a breach, 90 percent of repondents said they would want to be informed within 24 hours.

Of those interviewed, 76 percent said they would move away from companies with a high record of data breaches while 72 percent said they will now “share fewer personal details with companies”.

This stance is likely to hit businesses of entities like search engines and social media platforms that are dependent on collecting consumer data for advertisers, says FireEye.

For complete details of the survey, click here.                               

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2016 | 10:16:37 AM
Re: Growing awareness
"One other reference point in one survey (KPMG, Feb 2016) was that a huge majority of procurement managers surveyed would consider removing a breached supplier from their rosters"

That's interesting to note. Vendors/third parties can affect ones brand reputation as well. Also, depending on how a company interacts with a third party, that third parties security shortcomings can become a monumental risk to the organization to which they provide service.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2016 | 10:12:45 AM
Indirect Cost
Brand reputation loss is an indirect cost of a breach. Though difficult to measure in dollars, it can be more detrimental to a company then direct costs from a breach.
Vertices
50%
50%
Vertices,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/23/2016 | 9:21:01 AM
Growing awareness
Recent studies in the UK also show broadly similar statistics. One other reference point in one survey (KPMG, Feb 2016) was that a huge majority of procurement managers surveyed would consider removing a breached supplier from their rosters. Sobering.

PerfectCobalt
1.9 Billion Data Records Exposed in First Half of 2017
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/20/2017
To Be Ready for the Security Future, Pay Attention to the Security Past
Liz Maida, Co-founder, CEO & CTO, Uplevel Security,  9/18/2017
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Jan, check this out! I found an unhackable PC.
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
Enterprises are spending more of their IT budgets on cybersecurity technology. How do your organization's security plans and strategies compare to what others are doing? Here's an in-depth look.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.