Vulnerabilities / Threats

10/16/2014
05:40 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Silent' Fix For Windows USB Bug?

Researchers say a newly patched Microsoft USB flaw in older versions of Windows had at some time previously been fixed in newer versions of the OS.

Among the three zero-day vulnerabilities in the 24 software flaws patched by Microsoft this week was a security update for a USB attack affecting older versions of Windows.

The elevation of privilege vulnerability (MS14-063) in Windows Server 2003 and 2008 and Vista is in the FASTFAT system driver of these operating systems, which manages the FAT32 file system that handles the reading and writing of data from a disk. A Cisco researcher reported to Microsoft the bug in the older Windows OSes.

Researchers at BeyondTrust were curious why newer versions of Windows -- 7 and above -- weren't included in the MS14-063 patch, so they dug around and discovered that the bug appears to have been silently fixed in the newer versions of Windows. The flaw could allow an attacker to insert a malicious USB into a machine to ultimately wrest control of it.

Marc Maiffret, CTO at BeyondTrust, says it's unclear if the relatively late patch for the older versions of the OS resulted from an oversight by Microsoft or a "silent patch," where the software company made the fix in the newer OSes but for some reason didn't go back and do the same with the older versions of Windows.

"At some point, Windows 7 and newer versions were specifically fixed. The worry here when you have [only] some supported OSes getting fixed but not all, you wonder if the Cisco [researcher] was the first person to come across this or it had been used in attacks previously?" says Maiffret, whose firm posted a blog today on its findings.

"Years later now, we're lucky they found it," Maiffret says. "This is a great example of how you're really left a bit more insecure by running older, major OS versions -- even [vendor] supported ones."

Microsoft declined to comment for this article.

USB-born attacks got major exposure after the discovery of Stuxnet, which featured a poisoned USB attack at Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility. Most recently, researchers at Black Hat USA revealed the so-called BadUSB attack, where they reverse engineered and reprogrammed USB firmware to serve as a malware weapon. "The idea of USB memory sticks being attack vectors continues to grow," Maiffret says.

According to BeyondTrust: "This means that for many years now a vulnerability has existed in Windows 2003, 2008, Vista and XP systems while Windows 7 and above systems were fixed either accidentally or by a developer not taking the time to backport this fix into older, but still supported, operating systems."

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
10/20/2014 | 10:28:46 AM
Re: Intentional?
I actually wonder if it was an oversight of some sort by Microsoft.
Robert McDougal
50%
50%
Robert McDougal,
User Rank: Ninja
10/17/2014 | 11:29:14 AM
Intentional?
Makes you wonder if this was one of the intentional backdoors put in place at the request of the government.
Is Threat Intelligence Garbage?
Chris McDaniels, Chief Information Security Officer of Mosaic451,  5/23/2018
New Mexico Man Sentenced on DDoS, Gun Charges
Dark Reading Staff 5/18/2018
What Israel's Elite Defense Force Unit 8200 Can Teach Security about Diversity
Lital Asher-Dotan, Senior Director, Security Research and Content, Cybereason,  5/21/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Shhh!  They're watching... And you have a laptop?  
Current Issue
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
Most enterprises are using threat intel services, but many are still figuring out how to use the data they're collecting. In this Dark Reading survey we give you a look at what they're doing today - and where they hope to go.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-3018
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
The AXIS webapp in deploy-tomcat/axis in IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager (TADDM) 7.1.2 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.1.4 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive configuration information via a direct request, as demonstrated by happyaxis.jsp. IBM X-Force ID: 84354.
CVE-2013-3023
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager (TADDM) 7.1.2 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.1.4 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about Tomcat credentials by sniffing the network for a session in which HTTP is used. IBM X-Force ID: 84361.
CVE-2013-3024
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 through 8.5.0.2 on UNIX allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging improper process initialization. IBM X-Force ID: 84362.
CVE-2018-5674
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader before 9.1 and PhantomPDF before 9.1. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw...
CVE-2018-5675
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader before 9.1 and PhantomPDF before 9.1. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw...