Vulnerabilities / Threats
8/23/2013
05:39 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Nearly One-Fifth Of Enterprise Operating Systems Not Fully Patched

Less than half of organizations run malicious code execution prevention tools, Rapid7 survey finds

One in five IT professionals say they either have not fully patched their organizations' endpoint operating systems -- or they aren't sure whether the machines are up-to-date.

A fully patched operating system is the "minimum bar" for any organization, says Matt Hathaway, senior product manager with Rapid7, which today released results of a survey of 600 IT pros on their enterprises' endpoint security practices. Some 83 percent say their endpoint OSes are fully patched.

"Seventeen percent [with unpatched OSes] is unsettling as we really consider patching your OS to be the minimum bar for an organization's patching process," Hathaway says. "Our assumption is that this can be explained by the challenge of getting broad organizational buy-in for a consistent patching process and a disconnect between the security and IT teams. In some cases, availability is prioritized over patching: for example in the healthcare sector, where treatment is 24/7."

Another red flag from the survey: Fifty-four percent don't or don't know whether they run code execution prevention tools on their machines (think Microsoft's Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit). Of that group, 30 percent don't run these tools, and 24 percent don't know if they do.

Even though Microsoft regularly mentions EMET in its security blog, security pros still don't seem to be in the know much about it or its benefits, Hathaway says. "Additionally, a lot of our customers have stated that they never bothered implementing [EMET] 3.5 tech preview or the 4.0 beta because they were waiting for a final release. So the long lull may very well explain why our survey results show that EMET is not broadly used only a few months after the 4.0 final release."

The good news is that 96 percent of organizations run antivirus on their endpoints, and 90 percent say their email systems are configured to block suspicious attachments. That means a large number of businesses are employing tools to stop malware from hitting their endpoints, Hathaway says.

Around 16 percent don't require their users to select complex passwords that expire at regular intervals, and 2 percent don't know whether their organizations have this policy. "The fact that only 81 percent of respondents enforce complex, expiring passwords makes us question whether the industry debate over the effectiveness of passwords is being misconstrued to mean they are a waste of time," Rapid7's Hathaway says.

The full Rapid7 endpoint security survey is available here (PDF) for download.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Senior Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise Magazine, ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
plutoisgone
50%
50%
plutoisgone,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/28/2013 | 3:00:35 PM
re: Nearly One-Fifth Of Enterprise Operating Systems Not Fully Patched
I am surprised of the high number of people who say they are patched. I
believe some are not telling the whole truth because another recent
study by a MUCH larger and more trusted organization said that over 50%
of their studied results found organizations were still using the JAVA
release from over a year ago (which has known toolkits). And we all know that JAVA and Adobe are the nemesis of our lives. Maybe this study should be done by an "independent" firm.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Cartoon
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7392
Published: 2014-07-22
Gitlist allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a file name to Source/.

CVE-2014-2385
Published: 2014-07-22
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the web UI in Sophos Anti-Virus for Linux before 9.6.1 allow local users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) newListList:ExcludeFileOnExpression, (2) newListList:ExcludeFilesystems, or (3) newListList:ExcludeMountPaths parameter t...

CVE-2014-3518
Published: 2014-07-22
jmx-remoting.sar in JBoss Remoting, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JEAP) 5.2.0, Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5.3.1, Red Hat JBoss Portal Platform 5.2.2, and Red Hat JBoss SOA Platform 5.3.1, does not properly implement the JSR 160 specification, which allows remote attackers to exec...

CVE-2014-3530
Published: 2014-07-22
The org.picketlink.common.util.DocumentUtil.getDocumentBuilderFactory method in PicketLink, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 5.2.0 and 6.2.4, expands entity references, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary code and possibly have other unspecified impact via...

CVE-2014-4326
Published: 2014-07-22
Elasticsearch Logstash 1.0.14 through 1.4.x before 1.4.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted event in (1) zabbix.rb or (2) nagios_nsca.rb in outputs/.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Where do information security startups come from? More important, how can I tell a good one from a flash in the pan? Learn how to separate ITSec wheat from chaff in this episode.