Vulnerabilities / Threats

10/10/2017
02:00 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft Patches Windows Zero-Day Flaws Tied to DNSSEC

Security experts advise 'immediate' patching of critical DNS client vulnerabilities in Windows 8, 10, and other affected systems.

Microsoft today issued patches for three critical vulnerabilities in the Windows DNS client in Windows 8, Windows 10, and Windows Server 2012 and 2016 that ironically came via a security feature.

The heap buffer-overflow flaws discovered by researchers at Bishop Fox – and fixed via the new CVE-2017-11779 security update amid Microsoft's October Patch Tuesday batch - could allow an attacker to wrest away full control of the targeted Windows machine without the victim taking any action at all. The bugs were found specifically in Microsoft's implementation of one of the data record features used in the secure Domain Name System protocol, DNSSEC.

DNSSEC is a security layer for DNS that digitally signs and validates a DNS so it can't be spoofed.

Nick Freeman, the Bishop Fox researcher who discovered the vulnerabilities, says Microsoft's implementation of the NSEC3 (Next Secure Record version 3) feature for DNSSEC is the culprit. It's not surprising to find such a flaw, he says, because whenever a new security technology is added to software, it opens the door for implementation weaknesses. "Microsoft's implementation was poor" due to improper vetting of the format of the DNSSEC messages, says Freeman, who is a senior security associate with Bishop Fox.

"It wouldn't surprise me at all if other [vendors' DNSSEC] implementations" had vulnerabilities as well, he says.

But unbeknownst to Bishop Fox, another researcher, Nelson William Gamazo Sanchez of Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative, also had found and reported the flaws to Microsoft. The software giant credited both Freeman and Sanchez in its security update acknowledgements section.

For an attacker to exploit the DNSSEC vulnerabilities in Windows, he or she would need to be sitting on the same physical network as the targeted machine: that means a malicious insider, or an outsider who sets up a man-in-the-middle attack to intercept DNS requests from the victim's machine. DNS requests can be anything from browsing the Internet, checking email, or even the machine performing its own lookups for software updates.

The attacker could then respond to the Windows DNS requests with malicious data that would elicit the vulnerabilities and corrupt the memory of the DNS client. It then would allow him or her to control the DNS flow, and ultimately gain control of the victim machine. "If someone was using a corporate laptop at a coffee shop and on WiFi, or hacked your cable router and you got hit … giving the attacker an entry point into the [corporate] network," Freeman says. "They could then launch this attack against other systems on that network."

The best protections from such an attack: steer clear of public WiFi or use a VPN while connected to it.

DNS security is typically an afterthought at most organizations, mainly because DNS is a relatively invisible network function behind the scenes that's taken for granted. A recent survey found that three out of 10 companies have been hit with cyberattacks on their DNS infrastructure: and that's only the organizations that actually are aware of these attacks. 

It's been nearly one year since the massive DDoS attack on Domain Name Service (DNS) provider Dyn that disrupted major websites including Amazon, CNN, Netflix, Okta, Pinterest, Reddit, and Twitter.

Bishop Fox researchers, meanwhile, say they haven't seen signs of the Windows DNS flaws being abused by attackers yet. They recommend "immediate" patching of vulnerable Windows machines to protect against such attacks, and released a detailed technical report on the findings. 

"This is a very traditional vulnerability, so it's reasonable" for most attackers to be able to exploit it, Freeman says. 

Related Content:

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
gyufinite
50%
50%
gyufinite,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/10/2017 | 9:55:31 PM
sasa
wow,its so interesting
WebAuthn, FIDO2 Infuse Browsers, Platforms with Strong Authentication
John Fontana, Standards & Identity Analyst, Yubico,  9/19/2018
Turn the NIST Cybersecurity Framework into Reality: 5 Steps
Mukul Kumar & Anupam Sahai, CISO & VP of Cyber Practice and VP Product Management, Cavirin Systems,  9/20/2018
NSS Labs Files Antitrust Suit Against Symantec, CrowdStrike, ESET, AMTSO
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Are you sure this is how we get our data into the cloud?
Current Issue
Flash Poll
The Risk Management Struggle
The Risk Management Struggle
The majority of organizations are struggling to implement a risk-based approach to security even though risk reduction has become the primary metric for measuring the effectiveness of enterprise security strategies. Read the report and get more details today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-17368
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-23
An issue was discovered in PublicCMS V4.0.180825. For an invalid login attempt, the response length is different depending on whether the username is valid, which makes it easier to conduct brute-force attacks.
CVE-2018-17369
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-23
An issue was discovered in springboot_authority through 2017-03-06. There is stored XSS via the admin/role/edit roleKey, name, or description parameter.
CVE-2018-17400
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-23
The PhonePe wallet (aka com.PhonePe.app) application 3.0.6 through 3.3.26 for Android might allow attackers to perform Account Takeover attacks by intercepting the user name and PIN during the initial configuration of the application.
CVE-2018-17401
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-23
The PhonePe wallet (aka com.PhonePe.app) application 3.0.6 through 3.3.26 for Android might allow attackers to perform Account Takeover attacks by exploiting its Forgot Password feature.
CVE-2018-17402
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-23
The PhonePe wallet (aka com.PhonePe.app) application 3.0.6 through 3.3.26 for Android might allow attackers to discover the Credit/Debit card number, expiration date, and CVV number.