Perimeter
6/30/2011
04:52 PM
Commentary
Commentary
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Mass-Meshing A Gumblar Creation

Who doesn't love a new buzzword? 'Mass-meshing' is a new term that describes an old problem first presented by the Gumblar attacks in 2009

Recent media reports point to a supposed new type of attack that has been dubbed "mass-meshing" by the folks over at Amortize.

The Amortize report states, “We want to report a new type of mass-scale drive-by download attack that we'll dub "Mass Meshing Injection."" The report then goes on to explain what it is and how it differs from a SQL injection attack. The crux of their concern is that in this “new type” of attack, “Every redirector is itself an infected domain, which means blacklisting becomes more difficult and prune to false alerts.”

But that was exactly the case two years ago with Gumblar. From our ScanSafe blog post then:

“In a typical outbreak situation, there are compromised websites that act as a conduit for malware hosted on an attacker owned site. But in this case, the malware resides on thousands of legitimate (but compromised) websites.”

Of course, all those Gumblar-backdoored websites proved fertile grounds for other attackers to abuse, and in October 2009 we saw Zeus adapting this same method:

“Interestingly, compromised pages are also being injected with external source references to the malware contained on other compromised sites. Those who followed last week's report of the newest Gumblar technique will recall that unlike traditional compromises which simply inject pointers to malware hosted on an attacker-owned domain, in these attacks the compromised domain is also acting as host for the malware itself."

At the time, we also noted that:

"This method of attack complicates remediation via technologies that rely on blacklisting because the number of compromised websites (now acting as malware hosts) is in the thousands.”

And we also reported the same method being used in a random malvertising attack in 2010:

“ScanSafe STAT has been investigating an ongoing series of attacks which has been a hotbed for zero day exploits over the first quarter of 2010. The attackers are using three layers of legitimate sites. Two layers are compromised websites used to host malicious content that is then subsequently pushed to a third layer of legitimate websites via syndicated ads.”

The above references aren't to minimize the severity of mass-meshing style attacks, but rather just to point out that the mass-meshing technique isn't new.

Indeed, today it is pretty common to see interwoven attacks in which the compromised sites work in concert to interchangeably serve as conduit, redirector, and/or the actual malware host.

And while it does pose some additional challenges, overall security vendors seem to be coping fairly well with it. (Though obviously anyone relying purely on blacklisting would have a problem, but most use more layered defenses).

I have to say though that while the attack method isn't new, mass-meshing is a pretty cool, new buzzword to describe it.

Mary Landesman is an antivirus professional and senior security researcher for ScanSafe, now part of Cisco. In 2009 she was awarded a Microsoft MVP for her work in consumer security.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Considering how prevalent third-party attacks are, we need to ask hard questions about how partners and suppliers are safeguarding systems and data.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-4594
Published: 2014-10-25
The Payment for Webform module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.5 for Drupal does not restrict access by anonymous users, which allows remote anonymous users to use the payment of other anonymous users when submitting a form that requires payment.

CVE-2014-0476
Published: 2014-10-25
The slapper function in chkrootkit before 0.50 does not properly quote file paths, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse executable. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when /tmp is not mounted with the noexec option.

CVE-2014-1927
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly quote strings, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "$(" command-substitution sequences, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-1928....

CVE-2014-1928
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly escape characters, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "\" (backslash) characters to form multi-command sequences, a different vulner...

CVE-2014-1929
Published: 2014-10-25
python-gnupg 0.3.5 and 0.3.6 allows context-dependent attackers to have an unspecified impact via vectors related to "option injection through positional arguments." NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-7323.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.