Vulnerabilities / Threats // Insider Threats
5/22/2014
04:00 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Privileged Use Also a State of Mind, Report Finds

A new insider threat report from Raytheon and Ponemon reveals a "privileged" user mindset.

Most users with privileged access say they peek at their organization's sensitive or confidential data out of curiosity -- not as part of their work, a new study finds.

According to a Ponemon Institute report commissioned by Raytheon (registration required), 73% of privileged users -- network engineers, database administrators, security professionals, and cloud computing administrators -- say they are authorized to view all the information they can via their user privileges, and 65% of them do so merely because they are curious about the information.

"There's the human factor: [the ones] where it's not their job to go exploring. Over half are accessing that information just because they want to see what's out there," says Michael Crouse, director of insider threat strategies at Raytheon. "A person being curious and then exposes [data] could do damage to the company."

Crouse says the Ponemon report also shows how many of these users have a "sense of superiority" merely because they have such vast access to data in their organizations. "That tells me that's alarming to a CIO or CISO." The danger is that these entitled users may feel "above the law" and free to snoop at data unnecessarily.

According to the report, 83% of organizations say insider threats are worrisome, but they have trouble spotting potential insider threat activity. Nearly 70% say their security tools don't provide the analysis and context to determine intent behind incidents, and nearly 60% say their tools flood them with false positives.

Nearly half say a malicious insider likely could use social engineering or other ways to get another user's data access privileges, and 45% say outside attackers could socially engineer and target privileged users to gain access to their enterprise infrastructure.

Half of the respondents consider customer data most at risk, while 59% say general business information is in the bull's eye. A little more than 70% use authentication and identity management tools to track and manage insider threat issues.

"We've spoken to [enterprises] around the country and internationally, and they don't want to be the next Booz Allen" or government agency with a malicious insider, Crouse says. "They are trying to stay out of the limelight."

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
5/28/2014 | 8:55:14 PM
Monitoring
Nice paper here from SANS on setting up database logging and monitoring:

http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/application/setting-database-security-logging-monitoring-program-34222

Surprised that the percentage using tools to track insiders isn't close to 100 in this and every other study with all the products that are out there.

BP

 
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
5/28/2014 | 12:43:02 PM
Re: Privileged means bad
Absolutely. Even if these privileged insiders had no intention of sharing the information or leaking it, if they get targeted, then their credentials can be abused by the bad guys, etc. 
SachinEE
50%
50%
SachinEE,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/28/2014 | 12:36:00 PM
Re: Privileged means bad
It can be misunderstood as curiosity but in real senses it poses a danger to an organization. Think of an external party getting advantage of the 'privileged few' curiosity escapades and they get to access important and sensitive information about the organization. Things concerning their clients' personal details, their financial dealings, plan for the organization. This can pose as a threat since competitors' will bank on the information and use it to their advantage.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: You should see what I wear on my work from home days!
Current Issue
The Changing Face of Identity Management
Mobility and cloud services are altering the concept of user identity. Here are some ways to keep up.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.