Vulnerabilities / Threats // Insider Threats
5/22/2014
04:00 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Privileged Use Also a State of Mind, Report Finds

A new insider threat report from Raytheon and Ponemon reveals a "privileged" user mindset.

Most users with privileged access say they peek at their organization's sensitive or confidential data out of curiosity -- not as part of their work, a new study finds.

According to a Ponemon Institute report commissioned by Raytheon (registration required), 73% of privileged users -- network engineers, database administrators, security professionals, and cloud computing administrators -- say they are authorized to view all the information they can via their user privileges, and 65% of them do so merely because they are curious about the information.

"There's the human factor: [the ones] where it's not their job to go exploring. Over half are accessing that information just because they want to see what's out there," says Michael Crouse, director of insider threat strategies at Raytheon. "A person being curious and then exposes [data] could do damage to the company."

Crouse says the Ponemon report also shows how many of these users have a "sense of superiority" merely because they have such vast access to data in their organizations. "That tells me that's alarming to a CIO or CISO." The danger is that these entitled users may feel "above the law" and free to snoop at data unnecessarily.

According to the report, 83% of organizations say insider threats are worrisome, but they have trouble spotting potential insider threat activity. Nearly 70% say their security tools don't provide the analysis and context to determine intent behind incidents, and nearly 60% say their tools flood them with false positives.

Nearly half say a malicious insider likely could use social engineering or other ways to get another user's data access privileges, and 45% say outside attackers could socially engineer and target privileged users to gain access to their enterprise infrastructure.

Half of the respondents consider customer data most at risk, while 59% say general business information is in the bull's eye. A little more than 70% use authentication and identity management tools to track and manage insider threat issues.

"We've spoken to [enterprises] around the country and internationally, and they don't want to be the next Booz Allen" or government agency with a malicious insider, Crouse says. "They are trying to stay out of the limelight."

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
5/28/2014 | 8:55:14 PM
Monitoring
Nice paper here from SANS on setting up database logging and monitoring:

http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/application/setting-database-security-logging-monitoring-program-34222

Surprised that the percentage using tools to track insiders isn't close to 100 in this and every other study with all the products that are out there.

BP

 
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
5/28/2014 | 12:43:02 PM
Re: Privileged means bad
Absolutely. Even if these privileged insiders had no intention of sharing the information or leaking it, if they get targeted, then their credentials can be abused by the bad guys, etc. 
SachinEE
50%
50%
SachinEE,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/28/2014 | 12:36:00 PM
Re: Privileged means bad
It can be misunderstood as curiosity but in real senses it poses a danger to an organization. Think of an external party getting advantage of the 'privileged few' curiosity escapades and they get to access important and sensitive information about the organization. Things concerning their clients' personal details, their financial dealings, plan for the organization. This can pose as a threat since competitors' will bank on the information and use it to their advantage.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-4594
Published: 2014-10-25
The Payment for Webform module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.5 for Drupal does not restrict access by anonymous users, which allows remote anonymous users to use the payment of other anonymous users when submitting a form that requires payment.

CVE-2014-0476
Published: 2014-10-25
The slapper function in chkrootkit before 0.50 does not properly quote file paths, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse executable. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when /tmp is not mounted with the noexec option.

CVE-2014-1927
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly quote strings, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "$(" command-substitution sequences, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-1928....

CVE-2014-1928
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly escape characters, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "\" (backslash) characters to form multi-command sequences, a different vulner...

CVE-2014-1929
Published: 2014-10-25
python-gnupg 0.3.5 and 0.3.6 allows context-dependent attackers to have an unspecified impact via vectors related to "option injection through positional arguments." NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-7323.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.