Vulnerabilities / Threats
10/23/2009
05:04 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Gift Cards Convenient And Easy To Hack

Researchers reveal hacks for prepaid gift cards

It's not just credit cards and debit cards that are at risk of fraud: pre-paid gift cards can also easily be cloned and stolen by cybercriminals, according to newly published research.

Researchers at UK-based Corsaire say the magnetic-stripe technology used for gift cards and customer loyalty cards -- as well as their easy accessibility -- make them attractive targets for the bad guys. Gift cards can easily be "sniffed" off the shelf in the checkout line with a scanner and then cloned; the card number on the back of the card stolen; and the retailers' Web-based gift card applications hacked.

"Gift cards are a type of currency and thus, they're likely to be targeted by fraudsters in the future, says Adrian Pastor, principal security consultant with Corsaire, which first revealed some of its gift card hack research at EUSecWest in May, "It looks like standardized security guidelines are needed for the gift card industry. We're hoping that our paper will serve as a good first step in accomplishing this."

Even unactivated gift cards are at risk: Corsaire says all a fraudster has to do is take one from a display in a retail store, scan it with the proper scanning device to clone it, and then use the card once an unsuspecting customer buys it and it's activated. "Although gift cards need to be at a visible location in stores to attract customers, they should not be at a location easily available for anyone to reach. Doing so would help stop attackers from cloning them and putting them back on the stand," Pastor says. "By doing this, all the attacker needs to do is wait for a customer to activate the gift card and load it with credit. Because the magstripe track data on these gift cards is the same before and after being activated, the attacker could now purchase goods for 'free.'"

Some gift cards display their card number on the back, which can provide a fraudster with enough information to clone a card, or even to redeem the gift card at the retailer, for instance. This way, they don't even have to swipe the magnetic stripe. And sometimes the gift card numbers are printed on sales receipts, the researchers noted. "Some gift card balance lookup sites only require users to enter their gift card number, whereas others also require PIN in addition to the card number," Pastor notes.

And like any Web application, a gift-card application has its vulnerabilities -- including the pervasive SQL injection flaw. "We also introduced some attacks which although we haven't tested, could work against certain implementations. For instance, manipulating a card's balanced in the back-end database by crafting magstripe data with malicious SQL statements," Pastor says.

An attacker could modify the gift card balance this way, for example. But this would require knowledge of the retailer's internal systems, so it would be difficult to execute.

A more realistic hack would be the gift-card programs administrative console, according to the researchers. That way, the attacker could set the balance of the card, for example.

Corsaire's Pastor says he was surprised how it's possible to attack at least two UK retail chains by brute-forcing gift-card numbers against the balance look-up site. "[You then] record card numbers that have been activated and their corresponding balance. Because in the two particular card implementations the track data can be fully derived from the card number, you can essentially clone an active card without ever having physical access to it," he says.

Pastor says gift cards should be secured like any other type of currency and electronic payment transaction.

Corsaire's research paper is available for download here.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-5426
Published: 2014-11-27
MatrikonOPC OPC Server for DNP3 1.2.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (unhandled exception and DNP3 process crash) via a crafted message.

CVE-2014-2037
Published: 2014-11-26
Openswan 2.6.40 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and IKE daemon restart) via IKEv2 packets that lack expected payloads. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE 2013-6466.

CVE-2014-6609
Published: 2014-11-26
The res_pjsip_pubsub module in Asterisk Open Source 12.x before 12.5.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted headers in a SIP SUBSCRIBE request for an event package.

CVE-2014-6610
Published: 2014-11-26
Asterisk Open Source 11.x before 11.12.1 and 12.x before 12.5.1 and Certified Asterisk 11.6 before 11.6-cert6, when using the res_fax_spandsp module, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via an out of call message, which is not properly handled in the ReceiveFax dia...

CVE-2014-7141
Published: 2014-11-26
The pinger in Squid 3.x before 3.4.8 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and crash) via a crafted type in an (1) ICMP or (2) ICMP6 packet.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?