Vulnerabilities / Threats
3/22/2012
03:20 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
Repost This

Fake Caller ID Attacks On The Rise

"Vishing" attacks increased by 52 percent in the second half of last year

What if your caller ID showed an incoming call from your bank, but it was really from criminals posing as your bank? That's what's happening en masse, with a major surge in voice-call phishing, or vishing, attacks in the second half of 2011.

A new report from enterprise anti-phone fraud firm Pindrop Security found a 52 percent increase in vishing attacks in the U.S. between July and December 2011. There were 124,258 phony calls reported by banks in July, and some 189,439 in December, according to the report.

The numbers even surprised Pindrop, which had caught wind of such incidents from its enterprise customers. "The sheer breadth of these phishing incidents surprised us, and volume was increasing rapidly. We had an indication that a significant number of incidents was happening, but we didn't realize how quickly it was progressing" until we actually measured it, says Vijay Balasubramaniyan, founder and CEO of Pindrop Security.

According to the report, the top five U.S. banks were all targeted by vishers, and 30 of the top 50 banks as well. The attackers' weapon of choice: voice-over-IP, which accounted for 57.6 percent of the phone fraud attacks, followed by landline phones, 37.4, and then mobile, 5 percent.

The proliferation of VoIP has contributed to the rise in phone fraud, Balasubramaniyan says, as has the increased security of online banking systems. "Attackers move to the weakest link," which is posing as a bank and asking the caller to provide his banking information over the phone, he says.

Attackers basically automate scripts to dial multiple people and, like any mass phisher, cast a wide net that ultimately catches a few unsuspecting customers of the bank they have spoofed. The attackers can download CallerID software that allows them to show whatever phone number they want to, Balasubramaniyan says.

"They are targeting both consumers and businesses. The end goal is to steal money -- get identity information and then convert it to cash," he says.

Among the top cities for vishing attacks are New York (22,500 incidents), Washington, D.C. (21,000 incidents), Phoenix (19,500 incidents), Portland, Ore. (18,500 incidents), and Seattle (18,000 incidents), between July and December 2011. Los Angeles, Atlanta, Chicago, Houston, and Kent, Wash., round out the top 10 cities prone to vishing.

How do they select their targets? It's actually quite simple: They start with the area code and exchange for a particular region and blanket-dial a group of numbers, Balasubramaniyan says. "They do blanket calling and hope you are a bank's customer."

While most of these attacks are asking victims to provide their credit card or other account information, others are using actual credit card codes to dupe customers. They may use the digits that a specific bank uses for its credit cards as a lure, for instance, using "your credit card starting with the numbers 123," for instance.

"Then they could see who's falling for it, and that will start leading them to which areas bank with which banks more, and they can start spear-phishing customers," for instance, Balasubramaniyan says.

So who's behind these attacks? Pindrop says these are large criminal gangs. The company's honeypot has collected around 300,000 phone numbers used by attackers, and one of the biggest gangs operates with 4,000 different phone numbers.

Even so, vishing is still nowhere near as widespread as phishing. "I would say give it time," Balasubramaniyan says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Senior Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise Magazine, ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
lipanitech
50%
50%
lipanitech,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 12:20:45 PM
re: Fake Caller ID Attacks On The Rise
I guess social engineering is alive and well lol
mryan200
50%
50%
mryan200,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/27/2012 | 5:45:03 PM
re: Fake Caller ID Attacks On The Rise
I have a small professional office and I get 3 to 6 calls per day, it seems just to see if the number is operational.-á Immediate hangups are common.-á Look at www.whocalled.us or any number of websites where annoying calls are reported. Where is the government showing concern?-á It isn't. www.netproco.com is another fax machine call whose web site says report numbers not to call.-á This is outrageous. Verizon says it's not illegal.-á I have a phone system with 100 caller ID numbers that get shunted to "leave a message". Think I'll spend undetermiined amount of time getting through to the FCC?-á I have a bridge I'd rather sell you.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2012-0360
Published: 2014-04-23
Memory leak in Cisco IOS before 15.1(1)SY, when IKEv2 debugging is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via crafted packets, aka Bug ID CSCtn22376.

CVE-2012-1317
Published: 2014-04-23
The multicast implementation in Cisco IOS before 15.1(1)SY allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Route Processor crash) by sending packets at a high rate, aka Bug ID CSCts37717.

CVE-2012-1366
Published: 2014-04-23
Cisco IOS before 15.1(1)SY on ASR 1000 devices, when Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) tracking is enabled for IPv6, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted MLD packets, aka Bug ID CSCtz28544.

CVE-2012-3062
Published: 2014-04-23
Cisco IOS before 15.1(1)SY, when Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) snooping is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption or device crash) via MLD packets on a network that contains many IPv6 hosts, aka Bug ID CSCtr88193.

CVE-2012-3918
Published: 2014-04-23
Cisco IOS before 15.3(1)T on Cisco 2900 devices, when a VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 card is configured for TDM/HDLC mode, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (serial-interface outage) via certain Frame Relay traffic, aka Bug ID CSCub13317.

Best of the Web