Vulnerabilities / Threats

11/5/2013
04:41 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Custom Features Incur Security Flaws In Popular Android Smartphones

Researchers find vulnerabilities in preloaded customized apps and features

It's not the Android app stores that you need to worry most about: The biggest security weaknesses in most Android smartphones today are the custom apps and features that come packaged with the devices, new research shows.

Those are some of the findings from researchers at NC State who recently studied how custom vendor features on Android smartphones affect the security of the devices. Some 60 percent of all vulnerabilities the researchers found in popular smartphone models were due to what the researchers call "vendor customizations," or features the smartphone manufacturers tweak or include with the phones.

Another shocker: Newer smartphone models aren't necessarily more secure, according to NC State researchers Lei Wu, Michael Grace, Yajin Zhou, Chiachih Wu, and Xuxian Jiang, who will present their research tomorrow at the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security in Berlin.

"We all know that Android, though popular, has one major problem: fragmentation. Among other [things], vendor customizations play a key role in contributing to the fragmentation," Jiang said in an email interview. "We are interested in better understanding how vendor customizations will impact overall Android security."

[Google Android's single sign-on feature 'weblogin' convenient but risky to an organization's Google Apps, DEF CON researcher shows. See One Hacked Android User Can Lead To An Enterprise Breach .]

Jiang and his team studied Android Version 2.X and Version 4.X models from Samsung, HTC, LG, Sony, and Google -- specifically, the Samsung Galaxy S2 and S3; the HTC Wildfire S and One X; the LG Optimus P350 and Optimus P880; Sony Xperia Arc S and Xperia SL; and the Google Nexus S and Nexus 4. Some 80 percent of the apps on those phones were preloaded and customized by the smartphone manufacturers; all 10 devices were vulnerable due to those preloaded apps.

Jiang said the team's research uncovered other surprising trends: On average, 85 percent of all of these preloaded apps have too many user privileges on the devices, thanks to vendor customization. That means an app gets permissions it wouldn't actually use, such as the ability to send SMS messages, record audio, or make phone calls without the user's permission, for example.

The Android Version 2.x phones each contained an average of 22.4 vulnerabilities; the newer Version 4.x phones, an average of 18.4 vulnerabilities.

Upgrading to the newest smartphone model doesn't necessarily help securitywise, the researchers found. Every time the vendor customizes more features on the phone, it opens the door for more security flaws. "While a newer Android phone may run a newer version of OS , which might already fix vulnerabilities present in older versions, vendor customizations, however, being significant on these devices, could still introduce additional vulnerabilities into newer phones," Jiang said.

Of the Android 4.x phones, the Google Nexus 4 performed the best, with just three total vulnerabilities, and the Galaxy S3 fared worst, with 40 total bugs. That was only a slight improvement overall from the Android 3.x phones, however, where the Google Nexus S and the Sony Xperia Arc each had eight flaws (the lowest), the HTC Wildfire S had 40 flaws, and the Samsung Galaxy S2, 39.

Buyers can't do much about these preloaded apps, Jiang said, but smartphone manufacturers can step up by taking security and privacy more seriously in their designs. He said they should adopt the least-privilege principle when building apps and conduct white- and black-box vulnerability analysis to find and fix bugs.

"Through this study, we hope to highlight the need for heightened focus on security by the smartphone industry. And the work was supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation," Jiang says.

The full NC State research paper, titled "The Impact of Vendor Customizations on Android Security," is available here (PDF) for download.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Government Shutdown Brings Certificate Lapse Woes
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  1/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-20735
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in BMC PATROL Agent through 11.3.01. It was found that the PatrolCli application can allow for lateral movement and escalation of privilege inside a Windows Active Directory environment. It was found that by default the PatrolCli / PATROL Agent application only...
CVE-2019-0624
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
A spoofing vulnerability exists when a Skype for Business 2015 server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted request, aka "Skype for Business 2015 Spoofing Vulnerability." This affects Skype.
CVE-2019-0646
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Team Foundation Server does not properly sanitize user provided input, aka "Team Foundation Server Cross-site Scripting Vulnerability." This affects Team.
CVE-2019-0647
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Team Foundation Server does not properly handle variables marked as secret, aka "Team Foundation Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Team.
CVE-2018-20727
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-17
Multiple command injection vulnerabilities in NeDi before 1.7Cp3 allow authenticated users to execute code on the server side via the flt parameter to Nodes-Traffic.php, the dv parameter to Devices-Graph.php, or the tit parameter to drawmap.php.