Endpoint // Authentication
8/12/2014
03:45 PM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Quick Hits
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

UK Reconsidering Biometrics

Parliament is looking for answers about biometrics' privacy, security, future uses, and whether or not legislation is ready for what comes next.

Two years after the UK government decommissioned its controversial Iris Recognition Immigration System, Parliament has launched an inquiry into both the public and private sector's current and future uses of biometrics.

From the Parliament reference document:

    Commercial organisations, however, are starting to play a greater role in both developing and using biometric data and technologies. It is anticipated that this trend will continue over the next decade, particularly as the financial costs, and computational resources required, decrease. Some commercial uses are already mainstream. Social media sites offer facial recognition software to assist users tagging uploaded photos, while accessing some mobile phones depends on fingerprint recognition rather than entering a passcode. Supporters contend that technologies relying on biometric data have transformed identity authentication. However, concerns continue to be raised about data protection, loss of privacy and identity theft.

Though the IRIS system was shut down after eight years of use, the UK still uses biometric systems for e-passports and residence permits.

The Parliament Science and Technology Committee is seeking answers to questions about research and development priorities; potential uses of biometrics; the challenges of developing, implementing, and regulating biometric technology; and the effectiveness of current legislation in governing the ownership of biometric data and who can collect, store, and use it.

The deadline to submit comments to Parliament is Sep. 26.

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Robert McDougal
50%
50%
Robert McDougal,
User Rank: Ninja
8/16/2014 | 10:29:10 AM
Re: Security, privacy
I agree that we need more security, but I also agree we need to find the balance with privacy.  Something along the lines of using biometrics for authentication but not keeping records for longer than 90 days.
frank_lawrence
50%
50%
frank_lawrence,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/14/2014 | 12:59:11 PM
Re: Security, privacy
Not necessarily. Having stronger authenitcation would make it more difficult to have someone exploit your authenticator to see your information - which is only one aspect.  Using the same username (or biometric authenticator) could facilitate correlating access to two entirely different system - which may allow for unwanted leakage of private information.  If I have two completely unrelated username/password combination - the act of authenticating to two separate suites is more difficult correlate.  If one is facebook (where I have probably exposed to myuch info) and another is a health related web site which I have not talked about - being able to link the two could be a bad thing.

 

Larry
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
8/14/2014 | 11:37:39 AM
Re: Security, privacy
Whoopty, wouldn't having more a secure form of authentication such as biometrics give you more privacy protection, not less? 
Whoopty
50%
50%
Whoopty,
User Rank: Moderator
8/13/2014 | 11:17:26 AM
Security, privacy
While I really like the idea of biometrics being used for security - I have to remember too many passwords as it is - I'm wary of activity trackers and similar devices with lax privacy policies. I really don't want my insurance firm trying to find out anything about my health through a third party, or my bank checking my health to see how it would affect a mortgage. 

Some information should remain personal.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2010-5312
Published: 2014-11-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jquery.ui.dialog.js in the Dialog widget in jQuery UI before 1.10.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the title option.

CVE-2012-6662
Published: 2014-11-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the default content option in jquery.ui.tooltip.js in the Tooltip widget in jQuery UI before 1.10.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the title attribute, which is not properly handled in the autocomplete combo box demo.

CVE-2014-1424
Published: 2014-11-24
apparmor_parser in the apparmor package before 2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.1 in Ubuntu 14.04 allows attackers to bypass AppArmor policies via unspecified vectors, related to a "miscompilation flaw."

CVE-2014-7817
Published: 2014-11-24
The wordexp function in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.21 does not enforce the WRDE_NOCMD flag, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary commands, as demonstrated by input containing "$((`...`))".

CVE-2014-7821
Published: 2014-11-24
OpenStack Neutron before 2014.1.4 and 2014.2.x before 2014.2.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted dns_nameservers value in the DNS configuration.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?