Threat Intelligence

2/28/2019
10:30 AM
Alex Artamonov
Alex Artamonov
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

In 2019, Cryptomining Just Might Have an Even Better Year

The practice today is so pervasive that cryptojacking scripts are said to be running on an estimated 3% of all sites that users visit.

In 2018, bad actors — that is, those perpetrating cyberattacks on businesses and organizations — upped their game across a range of fronts, devising new and insidious attack vectors. While more-savvy users have continued to play defense, cybersecurity in general remains relatively weak — certainly, far weaker than it should be, given the nature and extent of the threat(s).

Anecdotally, the year witnessed a significant uptick in targeted attacks against cloud hosting companies. Where hacks once occurred seemingly at random, attacks are now more targeted, tracking the user population as organizations have moved to the cloud. No longer are attacks limited to local machines; as the number of virtual servers has proliferated, hackers have set their sights on these remote servers, recognizing the potential for both more damage and greater profit.

Ironically, the money isn't rolling in only from ransomware — which, on a relative basis, is actually less effective than it used to be. (Credit there goes to the IT/user community for more vigilant backup practices.) Cryptomining, or cryptojacking, emerged as a cash cow in 2018; the practice of embedding software that runs in the background, searching over time for cryptocurrency in stealth fashion, attests to the smarter, more sophisticated class of hacker that surfaced (or didn't) these last 12 months.  

According to Webroot's Mid-Year Threat Report Update, cryptomining — which consists of both ransomware and cryptomining — accounted for 52% of cybersecurity threats in the first half the year. By itself, cryptojacking (defined as "the nonconsensual act of cryptomining someone else's machine") was behind 35% of threats. The practice is so pervasive, the Webroot's report notes, that cryptojacking scripts are said to be running on an estimated 3% of all sites that users visit.

Closely linked to cryptomining is the notable rise this year in advanced persistent threat, or APT, incidents — a clear sign that attackers are creating ever-smarter malware, at nearly an artificial intelligence (AI) level. Malware is becoming sandbox-aware; once it gets out of the sandbox, it runs malicious code. That code can do almost anything nefarious — steal passwords, log keystrokes, send information from the server to the attacker, gain remote access to the server, hide files, and accept commands. By midyear, our organization began to see more "fileless malware." Running in memory, traditional anti-malware software can't intercept it. AI-driven anti-malware software is now in the works — yet another example of how any technology can be used for good or ill.

That said, I find it encouraging that organizations in 2018 did boost their investments in proactive security measures; some even began to change the way they look at security, examining past breaches and isolating lessons learned. Cloud hosting providers are getting better at playing defense, although methodologies like zero trust and least privilege aren't being adopted as rapidly or as widely as they should be.

That needs to change in 2019 if the IT community is to gain the upper hand on cryptomining and cryptojacking. Zero-trust architecture, as Forrester Research defines it, abolishes the idea of a trusted network inside a defined corporate perimeter. Zero trust mandates the creation of microperimeters of control around an enterprise's sensitive data assets and provides visibility into how it uses data across its ecosystem to win, serve, and retain customers.

Under a zero-trust regime, all applications are configured to challenge and encrypt, enabling the organization to build out its infrastructure around that concept. Zero trust, with multifactor authentication, is the industrial-strength option in today's environment and ought to be standard operating procedure moving forward.  

While perceived threats and vulnerabilities are assumed to exist outside the firewall, truly effective security policies assume nothing. The conventional wisdom once held that everyone inside the network was trusted and everyone outside was not. The newer, more enlightened paradigm for security is "more trusted" and "less trusted" — and that's where the principle of least privilege comes into play.

Per a University of Indiana knowledge base, the principle of least privilege promotes minimal user profile privileges on computers, based on users' job necessities. Each system component or process should have the least authority necessary to perform its duties. This helps reduce the attack vector of the computer by eliminating unnecessary privileges that can result in network exploits and computer compromises.

In savvy organizations, least privilege applies to every employee. Encryption is the rule internally, and multifactor authentication to log in to every networking component and storage system is mandated; no one can delete a snapshot or burrow into the firewall.

In this near-full employment economy, organizations are frankly hurting in their quest to find and retain qualified cybersecurity professionals. It's a challenge to hire people who truly know what they're doing, and distressingly, hackerworld is exploiting the talent gap. With cryptomining and cryptojacking poised to become a juggernaut in 2019, the security wing of the IT industry would be wise to plug that gap with all deliberate speed.

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Based in the Greater Phoenix area, Alex Artamonov is a systems engineer and cybersecurity specialist now in his 10th year with Infinitely Virtual.  Skilled in VMware ESX, Microsoft Server and desktop operating systems, HP Proliant, and HP blade ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Crowdsourced vs. Traditional Pen Testing
Alex Haynes, Chief Information Security Officer, CDL,  3/19/2019
BEC Scammer Pleads Guilty
Dark Reading Staff 3/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
Organizations are responding to new threats with new processes for detecting and mitigating them. Here's a look at how the discipline of incident response is evolving.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-10091
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
AudioCodes IP phone 420HD devices using firmware version 2.2.12.126 allow XSS.
CVE-2018-10093
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
AudioCodes IP phone 420HD devices using firmware version 2.2.12.126 allow Remote Code Execution.
CVE-2017-2659
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
It was found that dropbear before version 2013.59 with GSSAPI leaks whether given username is valid or invalid. When an invalid username is given, the GSSAPI authentication failure was incorrectly counted towards the maximum allowed number of password attempts.
CVE-2017-16231
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
** DISPUTED ** In PCRE 8.41, after compiling, a pcretest load test PoC produces a crash overflow in the function match() in pcre_exec.c because of a self-recursive call. NOTE: third parties dispute the relevance of this report, noting that there are options that can be used to limit the amount of st...
CVE-2017-16232
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
** DISPUTED ** LibTIFF 4.0.8 has multiple memory leak vulnerabilities, which allow attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption), as demonstrated by tif_open.c, tif_lzw.c, and tif_aux.c. NOTE: Third parties were unable to reproduce the issue.