Threat Intelligence

7/6/2016
10:30 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Diagnosis SOC-atrophy: What To Do When Your Security Operation Center Gets Sick

Whether it's due to lack of attention, poor capital planning or alert fatigue, there are lots of reasons why an SOC can become unhealthy. Here's how to make it better.

Congratulations, you’re the new CISO! Whether you have served in the role previously or it’s new to you, you’ll be asked to observe your new organization, to develop a 100-day plan, to evaluate people, processes, and technology, and of course you’ll need to tell the CEO where you would attack the organization and how you will protect against that. It’s a daunting and exciting task to be the new CISO. 

There is so much to observe, learn, and then you have to formulate a plan of action. You are inundated with learning the new organization from the CISO’s chair. Finally, the day comes when you tour the Security Operations Center. You are looking forward to this, because it’s operational; it’s where you fight the adversary—hackers with various forms of capabilities, motives, and sponsorship. 

Of course you want to see the chess match in action between your cyber analysts and threat actors. You look around: it looks like a SOC (analysts at monitors), and then your SOC Director briefs you on manpower, processes, technology, annual budget, measures and metrics. As the briefing continues your smile transitions to furrowed eye brows. As you investigate, and question, and seek to understand, you can see what has happened, your SOC is sick. You have seen the symptoms before and you know the diagnosis, it’s SOC-atrophy.  

SOC-atrophy: An omissive noun. 1. When your technology has remained dormant too long. 2. Unrefreshed cyber technology. 3. The absence of intelligence and heuristics. 4. Plagued by false positives.

Your SOC became sick for several reasons.

  • The technology you have is antiquated and completely signature-based, best suited for static threats, not advanced threats. While signature-based solutions have a role, it’s a secondary protection role.
  • The organization failed to keep up with technology and the evolving threat. For years, the organization has relied on incremental funding. This budget strategy has a typical result; a disparate mix of capabilities purchased individually as security silos without consideration for how the capabilities will work together. The tools don’t work together.  It’s an integration nightmare!

But SOC-atrophy is not a technology problem
As you sit down with your analysts, you observe that each analyst must be knowledgeable about several different tools and that they spend a lot of time collecting data and alerts. You observe the waterfall of alerts overflowing your analysts with data -- mostly false positives. The analysts have alert fatigue; they just can’t keep up.

The bottom line: the organization didn’t see the evolution of the threat, didn’t keep up with technology, and has not figured out how to use threat intelligence, much less integrate intelligence as a key enabler. The old technology in your SOC was the right decision for a different time, but not for today. 

Capital planning for cyber investment has also been a challenge. Typically SOCs are developed and funded piecemeal, a silo of capability at a time. This has a cause and effect, the tools are hard to integrate or don’t integrate at all, which in turn make it virtually impossible for an analyst to perform. Whether it has been lack of attention, inadequate measurement of effectiveness, poor capital planning, or alert fatigue, there are several ways for a SOC to become sick. Your goal now is to bring it back to a healthy state. Here are five strategies to overcome SOC-atrophy.

  1. Research to understand all SOC investments. You need to analyze the costs of each tool, effectiveness, and cost, and then prioritize the value of what you have. You will want to keep the best value, and get rid of the lower value, higher cost, solutions. This is your available trade space.
  2. Perform a SOC-focused assessment. This will gauge operational effectiveness and highlight gaps. Knowing your current health is a relatively low-cost endeavor and helps you in building a business case for investments to close the gaps.
  3. Study the threat landscape. From CEO to cyber analysts, your organization needs to clearly understand the threat landscape and how the threat is escalating. This understanding will help you focus on the technology, expertise, and intelligence you need to protect your organization.
  4. Resist the urge to fund your tools piecemeal. Develop the business case for an integrated platform with the ability to visualize web, email, file servers, endpoints, mobile, and SIEM, in one picture, enabling the ability to detect and remediate threats earlier in the kill chain. The board needs to understand the business case for an integrated platform.
  5. Encourage cross-organizational collaboration. It’s critical to build partnerships for vetting the business case and gaining consensus on your SOC plans. Spending quality time with your fellow IT executives and other business leaders to discuss -- at a strategic level -- what you are working on, your timeline, and your forthcoming proposal. There is no greater feeling than going into a board meeting with many of the members clearly in your corner.

Related Content: 

Black Hat’s CISO Summit Aug 2 offers executive-level insights into technologies and issues security execs need to keep pace with the speed of business. Click to register.

Lance Dubsky, CISSP, CISM, is Chief Security Strategist, Americas, at FireEye and has over two decades of experience planning, building and implementing large information security programs. Before joining FireEye, he served as the Chief Information Security Officer at two ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
WSJ Report: Facebook Breach the Work of Spammers, Not Nation-State Actors
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  10/19/2018
6 Reasons Why Employees Violate Security Policies
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer, Dark Reading,  10/16/2018
NC Water Utility Fights Post-Hurricane Ransomware
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/16/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
The Risk Management Struggle
The Risk Management Struggle
The majority of organizations are struggling to implement a risk-based approach to security even though risk reduction has become the primary metric for measuring the effectiveness of enterprise security strategies. Read the report and get more details today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-10839
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
Qemu emulator <= 3.0.0 built with the NE2000 NIC emulation support is vulnerable to an integer overflow, which could lead to buffer overflow issue. It could occur when receiving packets over the network. A user inside guest could use this flaw to crash the Qemu process resulting in DoS.
CVE-2018-13399
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
The Microsoft Windows Installer for Atlassian Fisheye and Crucible before version 4.6.1 allows local attackers to escalate privileges because of weak permissions on the installation directory.
CVE-2018-18381
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
Z-BlogPHP 1.5.2.1935 (Zero) has a stored XSS Vulnerability in zb_system/function/c_system_admin.php via the Content-Type header during the uploading of image attachments.
CVE-2018-18382
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
Advanced HRM 1.6 allows Remote Code Execution via PHP code in a .php file to the user/update-user-avatar URI, which can be accessed through an "Update Profile" "Change Picture" (aka user/edit-profile) action.
CVE-2018-18374
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
XSS exists in the MetInfo 6.1.2 admin/index.php page via the anyid parameter.