Threat Intelligence

7/3/2018
11:40 AM
50%
50%

Consumers Rank Security High in Payment Decisions

Security is a top priority when it comes to making decisions on payment methods and technologies.

In the list of considerations for how to pay for purchases, the security of the transaction method tops cash back and loyalty points for most consumers. That's the conclusion of a recent major payment industry study, reinforced by separate results from new private research.

The "2017 TSYS U.S. Consumer Payment Study," the latest annual version of research conducted by the payments provider, indicates that security is a top-of-mind issue for the majority of consumers. Regarding a question about moving to electronic wallets on smartphones, the study reports, "Consumers continue to be most interested in mobile features that allow them to instantly identify and stop unauthorized credit and debit transactions," with 80% reporting this as a reason for pursuing wallet apps. The ability to instantly see transactions was cited as another reason by nearly three-quarters (72%) of respondents. Both of these responses outpaced any convenience-related justifications for the new technology.

Security for new payment technology is in line with a response from TSYS's 2016 study that found when considering a new credit card, 74% of consumers ranked security and fraud protection as their priority, with 26% preferring rewards.

The survey on which the study was based also asked consumers about their comfort level with different authentication levels. Traditional passcode was the top response, with 69% stating their comfort with the method, but fingerprint authentication was close behind, at 63%.

For more, read here and here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
OliverJ237
50%
50%
OliverJ237,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/3/2018 | 3:15:18 AM
Re: My own anecdotal evidence
The survey on which the study was based also asked consumers about their comfort level with different authentication levels. Traditional passcode was the top response, with 69% stating their comfort with the method, but fingerprint authentication was close behind, at 63%.https://www.allicdata.com
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
7/6/2018 | 11:34:48 AM
My own anecdotal evidence
I can speak to this personally.

I remember there was a VERY rare recording/album I wanted by a musical artist whose work is next-to-impossible to find. After months of searching (both online and IRL), I eventually came across a website that sold the artist's recording that I wanted -- a website for the music publisher with whom the artist worked.

Or so it purported to be. The website was in the Netherlands and looked pretty sloppily put together. I did not feel comfortable trusting my personal payment information on the site (I couldn't even be certain if the website was legit) -- so I simply went without.

In hindsight, the website was probably legit, but it still left a bad taste in my mouth.
Government Shutdown Brings Certificate Lapse Woes
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  1/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3906
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 contains hardcoded credentials in the WCF service on port 9003. An authenticated remote attacker can use these credentials to access the badge system database and modify its contents.
CVE-2019-3907
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 stores user credentials and other sensitive information with a known weak encryption method (MD5 hash of a salt and password).
CVE-2019-3908
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 stores backup files as encrypted zip files. The password to the zip is hard-coded and unchangeable. An attacker with access to these backups can decrypt them and obtain sensitive data.
CVE-2019-3909
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 database uses default credentials. Users are unable to change the credentials without vendor intervention.
CVE-2019-3910
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Crestron AM-100 before firmware version 1.6.0.2 contains an authentication bypass in the web interface's return.cgi script. Unauthenticated remote users can use the bypass to access some administrator functionality such as configuring update sources and rebooting the device.