Analytics
5/13/2008
09:00 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Third Wave of Web Attacks Not the Last

The latest round of SQL injection Website attacks is stealthier - and from multiple regions

Researchers say the latest wave of Web hacks is related but more sophisticated -- and may have spawned copycat attacks.

David Dewey, manager of IBM ISS X-Force Research, says the latest round of SQL injection attacks on legitimate Websites are using commands that aren’t typical SQL commands. “These are commands that are intended to hide from network monitoring devices” such as IPSes and Web application firewalls, Dewey says. “The changes we're seeing are in their obfuscation techniques."

X-Force has seen anywhere from 20 to 30 new malicious sites popping up each day to host the malicious content that the attacks use, he says. The attacks for the most part have been out of China, Dewey says, but there’s been a growing trend of the attacks coming out of Europe as well.

He and his team believe the attack was initially organized by a single group, likely in China. “Then it caught on, and there were more waves,” some of which were possibly copycat attacks as well as other groups joining in, he says.

X-Force first noticed someone experimenting with this very type of attack that’s now underway back in January. So far, the infected Websites have been random victims, Dewey says. “As far as we can tell, the targets seem to be arbitrary. They blast it out and whoever accepts this SQL injection ends up being attacked.”

And although the attackers are using SQL injection to infect the Website applications, SQL injection is really just a means to setting up a persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) attack, Dewey says. “When you get down to the nuts and bolts of it, this is a cross-site scripting attack. SQL injection was just a vehicle to get there,” he says. “That’s because this is a more likely source of a persistent XSS than if the vehicle was XSS itself,” which would require a more targeted attack rather than the blanket one we’re seeing, he says.

And expect yet another wave of SQL injection attacks, he says. “There will be a fourth, a fifth, and a sixth."

“Frankly, SQL injection [vulnerabilities] have been so prolific for so long I’m surprised it took so long for it to be” exploited this way, Dewey says.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • IBM Internet Security Systems

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    Flash Poll
    Threat Intel Today
    Threat Intel Today
    The 397 respondents to our new survey buy into using intel to stay ahead of attackers: 85% say threat intelligence plays some role in their IT security strategies, and many of them subscribe to two or more third-party feeds; 10% leverage five or more.
    Video
    Slideshows
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2015-0192
    Published: 2015-07-02
    Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1, 7 R1 before SR2 FP11, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine.

    CVE-2015-1914
    Published: 2015-07-02
    IBM Java 7 R1 before SR3, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to bypass "permission checks" and obtain sensitive information via vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine.

    CVE-2015-1916
    Published: 2015-07-02
    Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unknown vectors related to SSL/TLS and the Secure Socket Extension provider.

    CVE-2015-3157
    Published: 2015-07-02
    ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.

    CVE-2015-3202
    Published: 2015-07-02
    fusermount in FUSE before 2.9.3-15 does not properly clear the environment before invoking (1) mount or (2) umount as root, which allows local users to write to arbitrary files via a crafted LIBMOUNT_MTAB environment variable that is used by mount's debugging feature.

    Dark Reading Radio
    Archived Dark Reading Radio
    Marc Spitler, co-author of the Verizon DBIR will share some of the lesser-known but most intriguing tidbits from the massive report