Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits
  • |   Email this page E-mail
  • |  Print Print
  • |   Bookmark and Share

Botnets Make Early Splash In New Year

As Rustock and Waledac begin pumping spam again, botnet experts say the bad guys will be up to their old tricks -- with some new twists -- in 2011

Jan 17, 2011 | 11:58 PM | 

By Tim Wilson

After a brief hiatus at the end of 2010, botnets are back. And they might have a few new tricks up their sleeves this year, experts say.

During the past week or so, researchers at NetWitness have reported increased activity on the venerable Rustock botnet, while researchers at Websense flagged a new spam push from the well-known Waledac network. The new spikes in botnet traffic come less than a month after many security research labs reported a downturn in spam activity in the final quarter of last year.

As the new year rolls out, botnet experts say that even though there was a slowdown last quarter, they expect botnet operators to continue their booming business in 2011 -- with some new twists.

"I don't expect to see a lot that is totally new, but instead, incremental development and improvement," says Joe Stewart, director of malware research at SecureWorks. "Botnet technology has matured to some extent, so you don't see too many truly new ideas coming out. However, the politically motivated attackers have started some new trends, such as opt-in botnets [and] JavaScript cross-site bots. I expect these tools to become easier to use, more effective, and more resilient in 2011. It should be an interesting year."

In its blog, anti-malware technology vendor Dasient predicts 2011 will bring "a large botnet cyber war" that will be won by Zeus, the Trojan toolkit that became botnet operators' favorite mode of attack in 2010.

"2011 will likely be the year that large botnets will start more aggressively competing to sustain their growth, and users will get caught in the middle," the blog says. "Zeus has proven its ability to grow to sizes more significant than other botnets, and is also one of the more profitable botnets that target financial institutions. Zeus will hold its ground against other botnets that try to attack it."

As botnets become more common, many operators will choose to simply steal infected PCs from other operators, rather than try to build their own networks, says Neil Daswani, CTO of Dasient. This infighting became evident in 2010, when botnet operators began distributing malware that actually patches vulnerabilities on the PCs it infects, making it more difficult for other botnet operators to use those flaws to infect the same PCs. "That sort of thing will probably be even more evident in 2011, and some users may even begin to see its effects," Daswani says. "Once the user's machine is caught in a battle between botnets, it may begin to experience slowness and unreliability that botnets have generally been able to hide in the past."

Another emerging trend is the use of social networks for botnet command and control, says Christopher Elisan, senior research analyst at Damballa, which makes technology for defense against botnets and other advanced persistent threats. "In the past, operators did their command and control using IRC or other channels that were easier to bring down," Elisan says. "But you can't take down a social network."

All of the botnet experts cited the recent surge in politically motivated distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, such as those in support of WikiLeaks, as a trend that will likely grow in 2011. As Stewart pointed out, some of these attacks are built on "opt-in" botnets that allow users who support a political cause to willingly instrument their PCs to participate. This botnet-building method can be difficult to defend against because the attacks emanate from devices and software not previously recognized to be associated with botnets.

DDoS attacks also change the way botnets are used, Elisan observes. While the operator of a large botnet typically parses out portions of the network to support a number of spam campaigns, a DDoS exploit might use all of the botnet's nodes in a single attack. In the case of the largest networks, this focused tactic can make a DDoS attack nearly impossible to defend against -- a sobering concept for large businesses, which will likely be the next targets, experts say.

On the other end of the spectrum, attackers are increasingly using smaller botnets to fly under the radar of detection mechanisms and infect specific targets, according to observers. "We have seen botnets as small as 10 computers -- the smaller it is, the less footprint it makes, and the harder it is to detect," Elisan says. Some small botnets might be given node names and addresses that are designed to look like everyday network designations, enabling them to hide in plain view of network administrators who don't know what to look for, he notes.

While smaller botnets might be useful for covert data gathering, larger botnets will continue to be used for broader attacks, such as spam campaigns and DDoS attacks, experts say. But are there uses for botnets that haven't yet been conceived?

"I'm convinced that we will see at least one new application for botnets this year that we haven't seen before," Daswani says. "We're already seeing some use of botnets for keystroke logging, and we expect we'll see more audio logging and Web logging as well. There's a lot going on in this space."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS












Bugs
ENTERPRISE VULNERABILITIES
Vulnerability:ssl-vpn end-point interrogator/installer activex control
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Stack-based buffer overflow in SonicWALL SSL-VPN End-Point Interrogator/Installer ActiveX control (Aventail.EPInstaller) before 10.5.2 and 10.0.5 hotfix 3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long (1) CabURL and (2) Location arguments to the Install3rdPartyComponent method.
Vulnerability:gvim
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Untrusted search path vulnerability in VIM Development Group GVim before 7.3.034, and possibly other versions before 7.3.46, allows local users, and possibly remote attackers, to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse User32.dll or other DLL that is located in the same folder as a .TXT file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Vulnerability:cforms
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:Medium
Description:Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in wp-content/plugins/cforms/lib_ajax.php in cforms WordPress plugin 11.5 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) rs and (2) rsargs[] parameters.
Vulnerability:links, wsn links, wsn links
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in search.php in WSN Links 5.0.x before 5.0.81, 5.1.x before 5.1.51, and 6.0.x before 6.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) namecondition or (2) namesearch parameter.
Vulnerability:deluxebb
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:Medium
Description:SQL injection vulnerability in misc.php in DeluxeBB 1.3, and possibly earlier, when magic_quotes_gpc is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the xthedateformat parameter in a register action, a different vector than CVE-2005-2989, CVE-2006-2503, and CVE-2009-1033.



Briefing Centers
POWERFUL INFORMATION
AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
(SPONSORED LINKS)