Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

Peer Pressure Drives Many To Acquire Security Certifications

New survey reveals how security pros really feel about the value -- or lack thereof -- of certs

Jul 26, 2011 | 08:19 PM | 

By Kelly Jackson Higgins
Dark Reading
Most security professionals attain security certifications for fear that if they don't have one, they'll be passed over in favor of those who do.

Click here for more of Dark Reading's Black Hat articles.

And most believe that holding a certification directly influenced their job advancement -- all of this according to the results of a new survey that will be disclosed next week at Black Hat USA in Las Vegas. Some 54 percent of the 1,350 IT security pros who participated in "The Value of Information Security Certifications Survey" said that they were either promoted or got another job based on their security certification status, while some 46 percent said they were not.

But security career experts say this could be more a matter of perception than reality. "Fifty-four percent believe the certification is powerful ... and a result of their advancement. I'm blown away by the perception of that," says security professional recruiter Lee Kushner of Information Security Leaders, an independent security careers website that hosted the survey. Kushner, who is president of LJ Kushner and Associates, says he sees a different reality in his day-to-day dealings in the field.

"In the world I live in, no one says, 'Hire this person because this person has a certification' or not," he says. "They hire the best person" for the job regardless of their certifications, he says.

Mike Murray, also with InfoSec Leaders and co-founder of MAD Security, says as a manager, he has never hired or promoted someone based on a certification: "I can't remember a time I've ever done that or known anyone who did that," he says.

"A lot of people believe in the value of certs. That value is because people believe in it," he says.

Three-fourths of the respondents in the survey either currently or previously have held information security certifications. Around 40 percent of the respondents "somewhat agree" that peer pressure is what motivated them to gain certification, and that it was necessary so they would not be passed over for jobs or promotions, while 15.4 percent said they "strongly agree" it was the impetus. More than 26 percent disputed that, and nearly 20 percent were neutral on whether certs give them a leg up professionally.

Even so, around 80 percent said the time and money they spent attaining certification was "a good use" of their resources, while nearly 9 percent said it was not.

Most of them said that if they were in a position to hire a security pro, they would require the new hire to hold at least one security certification. "So if you don't have one certification, you have no chance of getting a security job" in that case, Kushner says. And 16 percent said they wouldn't even offer an interview to a job candidate who didn't hold a cert.

"What other choice do I have but to get a certification?" Kushner says. "It's a self-perpetuating process."

But when asked whether the certification organizations that provide these certifications have security pros' best interests at heart, they are skeptical: More than three-fourths of the respondents said certification bodies are mostly focused on promoting their brands and proprietary certs -- and of that 75 percent, nearly 30 percent of them "strongly" feel that is the case. Around 16.5 percent are neutral, while about 7.6 percent disagree.

Even so, about half said the cert organizations do offer services outside of the certs themselves that "enhance" the careers of IT pros.

So does this mean that if you don't already have a CISSP, a SANS GIAC, or a CISM, you should definitely get one?

"It depends on where you want to be. If you want to work at a small company where no one has a certification, don't bother," Murray says. "But there are lots of places where you cannot get in the door without it."

Kushner and Murray will present the full survey results during their "InfoSec 2011 -- A Career Odyssey" workshop on Aug. 4 at Black Hat. The half-day workshop focuses on professional development, and namely skill development and differentiation. Among the presentations: the information security leader of the future, job applicant and employer perspectives during the interview process, and future career trends.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS












Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports
Bugs
ENTERPRISE VULNERABILITIES
Vulnerability:ssl-vpn end-point interrogator/installer activex control
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Stack-based buffer overflow in SonicWALL SSL-VPN End-Point Interrogator/Installer ActiveX control (Aventail.EPInstaller) before 10.5.2 and 10.0.5 hotfix 3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long (1) CabURL and (2) Location arguments to the Install3rdPartyComponent method.
Vulnerability:gvim
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Untrusted search path vulnerability in VIM Development Group GVim before 7.3.034, and possibly other versions before 7.3.46, allows local users, and possibly remote attackers, to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse User32.dll or other DLL that is located in the same folder as a .TXT file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Vulnerability:cforms
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:Medium
Description:Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in wp-content/plugins/cforms/lib_ajax.php in cforms WordPress plugin 11.5 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) rs and (2) rsargs[] parameters.
Vulnerability:links, wsn links, wsn links
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in search.php in WSN Links 5.0.x before 5.0.81, 5.1.x before 5.1.51, and 6.0.x before 6.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) namecondition or (2) namesearch parameter.
Vulnerability:deluxebb
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:Medium
Description:SQL injection vulnerability in misc.php in DeluxeBB 1.3, and possibly earlier, when magic_quotes_gpc is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the xthedateformat parameter in a register action, a different vector than CVE-2005-2989, CVE-2006-2503, and CVE-2009-1033.



Briefing Centers
POWERFUL INFORMATION
AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
(SPONSORED LINKS)