Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits
  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • |  Print Print this page
  • |   Bookmark and Share

WhiteHat: 90% of Sites Still Vulnerable

Most sites open to hacks via cross-site scripting, CSRF, report says

Mar 25, 2008 | 10:03 AM

By Tim Wilson
DarkReading

After years of fighting the hacker wars, today's Websites are still a long way from being secure, according to a new research report.

According to a report issued yesterday by WhiteHat Security, nine out of 10 Websites still have at least one vulnerability that attackers could exploit. On average, there are about seven flaws on each site studied.

"While the security posture of some industries is better than others, the difference is largely insignificant when it comes to preventing a Website from becoming compromised –- attackers only need to exploit a single vulnerability," the report says.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) is still the top category of vulnerabilities, appearing in approximately 70 percent of Websites, WhiteHat says. But the researchers are predicting that cross-site request forgery (CSRF) will eventually take the No. 2 spot behind XSS.

"Attackers using CSRF can easily force a user’s Web browser to send unintended HTTP requests, such as fraudulent wire transfers, changes to passwords and download of illegal content," the report says. "Effective automated CSRF detection techniques have eluded all technology scanning vendors in the space, making identification a largely manual process."

Despite high-profile breaches at chains such as TJX and Hannaford, the retail industry is still performing better than other verticals in terms of protecting Websites from attacks, WhiteHat says. The insurance industry tops the list of the most poorly-protected, with 84 percent of Websites having vulnerabilities that fall into the urgent, critical, or high severity ranking.

IT industry Websites were the next-most vulnerable at 72 percent, and health care and financial services were neck-and-neck at 64 percent and 60 percent, respectively, the company says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • WhiteHat Security


  • Subscribe to RSS










    Bugs
    ENTERPRISE VULNERABILITIES
    Vulnerability:suse linux
    Published:2010-01-22
    Severity:High
    Description:SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 SP3 (SLE10-SP3) configures postfix to listen on all network interfaces, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.
    Vulnerability:ie
    Published:2010-01-22
    Severity:High
    Description:The URL validation functionality in Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 and 8 does not properly process input parameters, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary local programs via a crafted URL, aka "URL Validation Vulnerability."
    Vulnerability:bind
    Published:2010-01-22
    Severity:Medium
    Description:ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
    Vulnerability:ie
    Published:2010-01-22
    Severity:High
    Description:Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-2530 and CVE-2009-2531.
    Vulnerability:ie
    Published:2010-01-22
    Severity:High
    Description:Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3671, CVE-2009-3674, and CVE-2010-0246.


    Briefing Centers
    POWERFUL INFORMATION
    AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
    (SPONSORED LINKS)