Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits
  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • |  Print Print this page
  • |   Bookmark and Share

DOE Lab Break-in May Be Tip of the Iceberg

Data breach at Oak Ridge National Laboratory part of a series of cyberattacks - possibly out of China - on US laboratories and institutions

Dec 07, 2007 | 07:18 AM

By Kelly Jackson Higgins
DarkReading

In what may be part of a larger series of cyberattacks on various U.S. laboratories and institutions, cybercriminals have broken into computers at the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and also reportedly targeted Los Alamos National Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

Authorities told ABC News that the attackers may be located in China. Security experts of late have been pointing the finger at China as the main source of many cyberattacks and cyber-espionage, but Chinese officials deny it. (See Cyberwarfare Now 'Business as Usual' and China Dismisses McAfee Cybercrime Findings .)

Names, Social Security numbers, and birth dates of visitors who were at the ORNL facility between 1990 and 2004 may have been stolen in the attack, according to ORNL. The around 12,000 potential victims have been contacted by ORNL, but so far, there's no evidence that the data has been used. ORNL says the sophisticated breach appears to be part of a wider "attempt to gain access to computer networks at numerous laboratories and institutions across the country."

ORNL did not reveal the names of any other sites or organizations that may have been targeted, but a Lawrence Livermore spokesman said its security systems blocked recent attack attempts.

The attackers apparently gained access to ORNL's computers over the past few weeks via phishing emails posing as official and legitimate messages. Around 11 employees reportedly fell for the phishing schemes, which infected their machines with malware that let the attacker or attackers steal and copy data. No classified data was taken, however.

It all started with an email and possible infection on October 29, according to a memo ORNL officials sent to the lab's employees. There were over 1,000 phishing emails sent to the lab, which houses one of the fastest supercomputers in the world, nicknamed Jaguar.

"This was not just a coincidence... someone finding a laptop that coincidentally had sensitive data on it," says Ted Julian, vice president of marketing and strategy for AppSecInc. "Someone was diligently searching for stuff of value. They didn't just stumble upon this."

The DOE attack demonstrates just how difficult it is to lock down data, according to Julian. Attackers only need one hole to get in, he says. "You're never going to stop every user from clicking on a [bad] link," he says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.


Subscribe to RSS










Bugs
ENTERPRISE VULNERABILITIES
Vulnerability:suse linux
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 SP3 (SLE10-SP3) configures postfix to listen on all network interfaces, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.
Vulnerability:ie
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:The URL validation functionality in Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 and 8 does not properly process input parameters, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary local programs via a crafted URL, aka "URL Validation Vulnerability."
Vulnerability:bind
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:Medium
Description:ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
Vulnerability:ie
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-2530 and CVE-2009-2531.
Vulnerability:ie
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3671, CVE-2009-3674, and CVE-2010-0246.


Briefing Centers
POWERFUL INFORMATION
AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
(SPONSORED LINKS)