Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits
  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • |  Print Print this page
  • |   Bookmark and Share

Zero Day Flaw Found in MySpace

A variant of an XSS vulnerability opens the door for worms, phishing, and port scans via the popular social networking site

Oct 24, 2006 | 08:25 AM

By Kelly Jackson Higgins
DarkReading

A researcher has published proof-of-concept code on a zero-day vulnerability he found on MySpace.com -- and another variation on the cross-site scripting (XSS) theme.

Called XSS fragmentation, the vulnerability consists of multiple chunks, or fragments, of JavaScript malware that can slip by a filter or firewall because individually they don't constitute a security risk. But when they are combined after hitting the site, they can then be dangerous.

XSS fragmentation is rare, but a potentially powerful vulnerability that could be used against community-based sites such as MySpace or Web-based mail systems, security experts say. MySpace in particular is vulnerable because it takes user-supplied content and stores it without adequate filtering, says Jeremiah Grossman, CTO of White Hat Security. An e-commerce site would not be at risk to this type of attack, he says.

XSS in general has become one of the most prevalent targets of online hackers, with many major Websites sporting XSS vulnerabilities. (See Cross-Site Scripting: Attackers' New Favorite Flaw and Hackers Reveal Vulnerable Websites.)

With XSS fragmentation, an attacker could inject the script fragments onto the MySpace user's interests section, such as music and film, according to the proof-of-concept posting by kuza55, the hacker who discovered the vulnerability.

Once the JavaScript fragments get on the site, they assemble and do their dirty work -- dropping a worm, stealing browser history, port-scanning a victim's intranet, or shooting off phishing emails purportedly from MySpace to steal logins and passwords.

"I personally have only seen XSS fragmentation a few times," says hacker Rsnake, founder of the sla.ckers.org site where kuza55 posted the proof-of-concept code. "This isn't that common of an attack, as it generally requires that there be two or more places to inject code on the page."

Interestingly, scanning alone won't detect XSS fragmentation, nor will blacklisting eliminate the threat. White Hat Security's Grossman, whose company runs a vulnerability assessment and management service for Websites, says it takes human intervention to detect such a vulnerability or attack because it's typically targeted at a specific site or organization. Whitelisting -- specifying what data is allowed -- would be a better way to prevent such an attack, he says.

"This attack is pretty involved. Scanning is not going to find it, but human assessment would," he says. "In Web attacks, there's going to be someone sitting behind a browser... You have to match their skillset, and that's where the human assessment part" comes in.

MySpace had not responded to inquiries for this article as of presstime.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • WhiteHat Security


  • Subscribe to RSS










    Bugs
    ENTERPRISE VULNERABILITIES
    Vulnerability:suse linux
    Published:2010-01-22
    Severity:High
    Description:SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 SP3 (SLE10-SP3) configures postfix to listen on all network interfaces, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.
    Vulnerability:ie
    Published:2010-01-22
    Severity:High
    Description:The URL validation functionality in Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 and 8 does not properly process input parameters, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary local programs via a crafted URL, aka "URL Validation Vulnerability."
    Vulnerability:bind
    Published:2010-01-22
    Severity:Medium
    Description:ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
    Vulnerability:ie
    Published:2010-01-22
    Severity:High
    Description:Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-2530 and CVE-2009-2531.
    Vulnerability:ie
    Published:2010-01-22
    Severity:High
    Description:Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3671, CVE-2009-3674, and CVE-2010-0246.


    Briefing Centers
    POWERFUL INFORMATION
    AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
    (SPONSORED LINKS)