Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

New System Helps TRX Get Its Encryption Together

TRX uses Vormetric to pull encryption together across operating systems, application environments

Oct 06, 2008 | 01:56 AM | 

By DarkReading

Sometimes the problem isn't deciding whether to do encryption, but how to do it across a variety of systems and environments. For one travel industry service supplier, that question has recently been answered.

TRX, based in Atlanta, supplies services, such as online booking, reservation processing, and data intelligence, to travel agencies, corporations, travel suppliers, government agencies, and credit card organizations. Each year, the firm, which has 1,000 employees in eight locations, processes 150 million transactions for its customers.

As new regulations, such as Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI DSS), were being enacted, the travel industry service supplier decided to take a close look at its security practices. “We had confidential data sitting in some of our databases that needed to be encrypted,” said Chris Mauer, director of security and controls at TRX.

While the problem was clear, the potential solution was not. Because the service supplier had grown via acquisitions throughout its history, TRX found itself in a highly heterogeneous environment. The company supports multiple operating systems (Microsoft’s Windows, Linux), database management systems (Oracle, SQL Server, IBM’s DB2), and programming languages (Java, Microsoft’s Visual Studio).

Because the systems had evolved in a haphazard manner, the company’s encryption mechanisms were inefficient. The corporation stored data that was not encrypted, used different encryption products, stored keys in different locations (some in the applications and others by the users), and had a hodgepodge of key management systems.

With new applications -- such as TravelTrax, a hosted travel data reporting services -- in the pipeline, the firm determined it was time to make its DBMS encryption procedures more consistent and more cohesive.

In the spring of 2007, the company went to the market to find a suitable product but was left with few selections. “Not many companies could support the broad range of systems that we had,” stated TRX’s Mauer.

The evaluation eventually was narrowed down to Vormetric Inc.’s Data Security Expert or an internally developed encryption system. The TRX supplier decided to go with the former for a couple of reasons. The Vormetric system was appliance-based, so it could be easily slipped into TRX’s network. It did not require a great deal of programming: The travel industry services supplier did not have to change any data table structures, data fields, or application source code.

However, DBMS encryption products can be expensive, costing as much as $10,000 per DBMS. Since TRX has about 30 databases, its cost quickly shot past the $100,000 mark. Yet this cost was still less than developing a DBMS encryption system in-house.

The decision to purchase the Vormetric product was made in August, but the rollout came a few months later. Because the DBMS information is mission critical, TRX wanted to be sure that its new solution was stable. Near the end of 2007, the company starting adding Vormetric’s Data Security Expert to its DBMSs in a piecemeal fashion and finished the job in the fall of 2008

Performance degradation is one concern with encryption products, but TRX hasn't run into that problem so far. “From our performance testing, we have seen only negligible increases in CPU usage,” said Mauer.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS












Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports
Bugs
ENTERPRISE VULNERABILITIES
Vulnerability:ssl-vpn end-point interrogator/installer activex control
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Stack-based buffer overflow in SonicWALL SSL-VPN End-Point Interrogator/Installer ActiveX control (Aventail.EPInstaller) before 10.5.2 and 10.0.5 hotfix 3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long (1) CabURL and (2) Location arguments to the Install3rdPartyComponent method.
Vulnerability:gvim
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Untrusted search path vulnerability in VIM Development Group GVim before 7.3.034, and possibly other versions before 7.3.46, allows local users, and possibly remote attackers, to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse User32.dll or other DLL that is located in the same folder as a .TXT file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Vulnerability:cforms
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:Medium
Description:Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in wp-content/plugins/cforms/lib_ajax.php in cforms WordPress plugin 11.5 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) rs and (2) rsargs[] parameters.
Vulnerability:links, wsn links, wsn links
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in search.php in WSN Links 5.0.x before 5.0.81, 5.1.x before 5.1.51, and 6.0.x before 6.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) namecondition or (2) namesearch parameter.
Vulnerability:deluxebb
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:Medium
Description:SQL injection vulnerability in misc.php in DeluxeBB 1.3, and possibly earlier, when magic_quotes_gpc is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the xthedateformat parameter in a register action, a different vector than CVE-2005-2989, CVE-2006-2503, and CVE-2009-1033.



Briefing Centers
POWERFUL INFORMATION
AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
(SPONSORED LINKS)