Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits
  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • |  Print Print this page
  • |   Bookmark and Share

IT's Tower of Babel

Successful security means finding a common language among IT, business management, and legal people

Jan 04, 2007 | 12:55 PM

By DarkReading
DarkReading

Even though they are on the same team, IT security professionals and corporate employees often do not speak the same language. Yet all are tasked with building a stronger and more robust corporation.

For example, how many times have you faced these situations? You request new security hardware or software to secure the perimeter, are denied that request, and later are expected to explain why an intrusion into the company’s IT infrastructure occurred. Or you are instructed to comply with a new law or privacy requirement, but not given the tools or support necessary to do the job.

How can an IT department increase awareness and understanding of security issues among leadership or other business units?

One possible solution is to educate your company’s leadership by demonstrating how IT security is interconnected with the law, compliance issues, and privacy requirements. By being able to translate technical aspects of your job into real business terms -- and by working across business sectors to implement real solutions -- IT staff can garner the support of others within their company.

While it may not be possible for everyone to fluently speak the same language of IT security, you should expect that the basics of IT security be understood by a broader corporate audience.

How will future editions of this column assist you in this process?

Periodically, we will examine real world situations and the laws, recent legal decisions, and other regulations regarding issues affecting information technology. Some situations will be based on actual cyber security matters and others will be cautionary tales of expected future legal developments.

You can expect columns discussing the legal implications resulting from hacking attacks, data extortion, data theft, and other types of data breaches and regulatory compliance issues involving Gramm-Leach Bliley, HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley, and FinCEN Regulations. We'll also address privacy matters involving e-commerce, Website policies, and FTC violations resulting from unfair or deceptive trade practices.

While many of these laws are discussed in other forums, it is my goal that each column will not only discuss these laws and regulations, but also answer the question: "Now what?"

It is only by combining the technical issues of cybersecurity, the framework of corporate governance, and the regulatory/legal framework that progress can be made in better securing the corporate information technology systems that comprise our nation’s critical infrastructures.

Ensuring that companies can speak and understand the joint language of IT security is one way to prevent an IT Tower of Babel.

Dr. Chris Pierson is an attorney with the law firm of Lewis and Roca LLP. Special to Dark Reading


Subscribe to RSS










Bugs
ENTERPRISE VULNERABILITIES
Vulnerability:suse linux
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 SP3 (SLE10-SP3) configures postfix to listen on all network interfaces, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.
Vulnerability:ie
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:The URL validation functionality in Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 and 8 does not properly process input parameters, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary local programs via a crafted URL, aka "URL Validation Vulnerability."
Vulnerability:bind
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:Medium
Description:ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
Vulnerability:ie
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-2530 and CVE-2009-2531.
Vulnerability:ie
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3671, CVE-2009-3674, and CVE-2010-0246.


Briefing Centers
POWERFUL INFORMATION
AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
(SPONSORED LINKS)