Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits
  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • |  Print Print this page
  • |   Bookmark and Share

Gumblar Botnet Resurges

Reactivation of Gumblar.cn domain could have ripple effect, researchers say

Nov 06, 2009 | 04:01 PM

By Tim Wilson
DarkReading

Gumblar, a botnet that emerged as one of the Internet's largest earlier this year, is back, researchers said yesterday.

According to researchers at ScanSafe, a new iFrame injection is pointing once again to gumblar.cn -- the malware domain that originally earned Gumblar its name.

"The domain's reactivation occurred less than 24 hours ago, but it has ramifications that could stretch back for months," said ScanSafe researcher Gregg Conklin, in a blog. "Any sites compromised in the May Gumblar attacks that were not yet cleaned up (unfortunately an all-to-common occurrence) could now start becoming vectors of Gumblar infection once again. This is in addition to new compromises pointing to the newly-activated gumblar.cn and the already very active Gumblar compromises which are using compromised websites as malware hosts."

The Gumblar infection manifests in two ways, ScanSafe says. In some cases, the compromised sites may act as actual malware hosts. In other cases, the compromised sites are injected with iFrames that point to those malware hosts.

"In a typical Web malware outbreak, there are only a few malware hosts," Scansafe says. "But because the Gumblar attackers have this botnet of backdoored Websites at their disposal, there are now thousands of malware hosts. This makes stemming the flow of the attacks (i.e., shutting down the hosts) nearly impossible."

In October, 28.8 percent of all ScanSafe Web malware blocks were the result of the latest Gumblar attacks -- double the amount observed in the May outbreak, ScanSafe says. "The latest run of Gumblar has been highly successful for the attackers, all because the malware itself is being hosted on thousands of other compromised sites," Conklin says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.


Subscribe to RSS










Bugs
ENTERPRISE VULNERABILITIES
Vulnerability:suse linux
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 SP3 (SLE10-SP3) configures postfix to listen on all network interfaces, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.
Vulnerability:ie
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:The URL validation functionality in Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 and 8 does not properly process input parameters, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary local programs via a crafted URL, aka "URL Validation Vulnerability."
Vulnerability:bind
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:Medium
Description:ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
Vulnerability:ie
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-2530 and CVE-2009-2531.
Vulnerability:ie
Published:2010-01-22
Severity:High
Description:Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3671, CVE-2009-3674, and CVE-2010-0246.


Briefing Centers
POWERFUL INFORMATION
AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
(SPONSORED LINKS)