Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

FTC Slaps Twitter Down Hard For Lax Security, Privacy Violations

Social networking site's claims will be scrutinized for 20 years; security program will be audited for 10 years

Jun 25, 2010 | 01:02 PM | 

By Tim Wilson

Social networking service Twitter has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it deceived consumers and put their privacy at risk by failing to safeguard their personal information, the FTC said yesterday.

The FTC's complaint against Twitter charges that serious lapses in the company's data security allowed hackers to obtain unauthorized administrative control of Twitter, including access to nonpublic user information, tweets that consumers had designated private, and the ability to send out phony tweets from any account -- including those belonging to then-President-elect Barack Obama and Fox News.

"When a company promises consumers that their personal information is secure, it must live up to that promise," said David Vladeck, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "Likewise, a company that allows consumers to designate their information as private must use reasonable security to uphold such designations."

Twitter offers privacy settings through which a user can choose to designate tweets as nonpublic, the FTC notes. For instance, users can send "direct messages" to a specified follower so that only the specific author and recipient can view the message. Twitter users can also click a button labeled "Protect my tweets," which means only approved followers can view them.

According to the FTC, the privacy policy posted on Twitter's website stated that "Twitter is very concerned about safeguarding the confidentiality of your personally identifiable information. We employ administrative, physical, and electronic measures designed to protect your information from unauthorized access."

The FTC's complaint alleges that between January and May 2009, hackers were able to gain administrative control of Twitter on two occasions. In January 2009, a hacker used an automated password-guessing tool to gain administrative control of Twitter after submitting thousands of guesses into Twitter's login website. The administrative password was a weak, lowercase, common dictionary word, the complaint says.

Using the password, the hacker reset several passwords and posted some of them on a website, where other people could access them. Using these fraudulently reset passwords, other intruders sent phony tweets from approximately nine user accounts. One tweet was sent from the account of then-President-elect Barack Obama, offering his more than 150,000 followers a chance to win $500 in free gasoline. At least one phony tweet was sent from the account of Fox News.

During a second security breach in April 2009, a hacker was able to guess the administrative password of a Twitter employee after compromising the employee's personal email account, where two similar passwords were stored in plain text. The hacker reset at least one Twitter user's password, and could access nonpublic user information and tweets for any Twitter users.

According to the FTC's complaint, Twitter was vulnerable to these attacks because it failed to prevent unauthorized administrative control of its system, including reasonable steps in password management among administrators and employees.

Under the terms of the settlement, Twitter will be barred for 20 years from misleading consumers about the extent to which it protects the security, privacy, and confidentiality of nonpublic consumer information, including the measures it takes to prevent unauthorized access to nonpublic information and honor the privacy choices made by consumers.

The company also must establish and maintain a comprehensive information security program, which will be assessed by an independent auditor every other year for 10 years.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS



Security Services Reports

report Using Service Providers To Manage DDoS Threats
When it comes to the battle against distributed denial-of-service attacks, you are not alone. With the increasing use of third-party service providers, your organization likely has a huge arsenal of bandwidth, technology and know-how at its disposal. The challenge is to effectively marshal those resources among your providers and integrate them with your own security measures into a strategic and comprehensive DDoS protection plan.

report Hosted Web Security Services: Block Malware Before Your Border
Security service providers are now delivering a wide range of packaged offerings, including Web content filtering, anti-malware, data leak prevention, and many other capabilities. How can your organization take advantage of these Web security services, and how can you choose the right provider? This Dark Reading Tech Center report offers a look at these services and some recommendations on how best to implement them.

report You've Got (Secure) Mail: Using Service Providers to Boost Protection
The SaaS market is still in its infancy, but hosted e-mail security firms are leading the way, thanks to ease of implementation and many obvious benefits. Still, these services are not without risks. In this Dark Reading Tech Center report, we'll discuss how to determine what mix of in-house and hosted email security makes sense for your organization.

Other reports from the Security Services Tech Center:

Related Content

Establishing a Formal Cyber Intelligence Capability
Organizations are realizing that advanced intelligence capabilities consistently deliver substantial cost savings - with proactive insights on true threats, the intelligence to avoid false alarms, and the system and application availability required to preserve revenues and customer loyalty. But achieving these benefits requires organizations to establish a formal cyber intelligence capability. Read this whitepaper to learn about a proven, repeatable process with clearly established steps for setting up an in-house cyber security intelligence operation.

DDoS Mitigation: Best Practices for a Rapidly Changing Threat Landscape
Although DDoS attacks have become a mainstay of hackers' arsenals, their profile has changed considerably in the past year, making them an even greater threat to companies that conduct business online. DDoS attacks are larger, stealthier, more targeted, and more sophisticated than ever. Get best practices to enable your organization to keep pace with DDoS attacks while minimizing impact on business operations.

2012 Cyber Crime Threats and Trends
Get the highlights of 2011 cyber security trends and how those trends and others might unfold in 2012. This report is a strategic complement to daily tactical intelligence reports and provides IT security and business operations with actionable and relevant decision support.

Using Hybrid Routing to Optimize DNS Resolution Performance and Reliability
To create a satisfactory end user experience, enterprises must ensure that DNS resolution is fast and reliable. Learn more about how using a hybrid routing solution can greatly maximize performance while minimizing latency-and address your business' specific needs along the way.

A Cost Analysis of Approaches To DDoS Protection.
All organizations with an online presence or dependence on Internet-based systems need to fortify their defenses against DDoS attacks. DDoS can cost an organization in tangible losses and in more subtle ways. Read this whitepaper for a deeper perspective on the cost benefits of a dedicated, cloud-based DDoS service over an in-house hardware solution or over-provisioning through your ISP.




Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports