Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

Researcher Intercepts GSM Cell Phones During Defcon Demo

In the wake of pressure from the FCC, security expert demonstrates major GSM hack

Jul 31, 2010 | 06:36 PM | 

By Kelly Jackson Higgins

DEFCON18 -- Las Vegas -- A hardware hacking expert here at Defcon18 successfully faked several attendees' cell phones into connecting to his phony GSM base station during a live demonstration that had initially raised concerns at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

Security researcher Chris Paget's presentation here was aimed at demonstrating security weaknesses in the GSM protocol using a homegrown GSM base station running over ham-radio frequency. His so-called "IMSI Catcher" acted as a spoofed GSM tower and fake base station that could convince GSM handsets to connect to as the closest "tower" in proximity.

GSM technology is used in 80 percent of the world's mobile phone calls, and has been the subject of previous security research poking holes in it. Paget said his intention was to demonstrate how the protocol is basically broken: "The main problem is that GSM is broken. You have 3G and all of these later protocols with problems for GSM that have been known for decades. It's about time we move on," Paget said in a press briefing yesterday prior to today's demo.

Paget's demo almost didn't happen at all: it wasn't until the late last night that he decided to go forward with the live demo of the hack after conferring again with Electronic Frontier Foundation attorneys after the FCC voiced its concerns that the demo might involve the unlawful interception of phone calls: "The response we got from the FCC is that [they couldn't] advise whether this is a good thing or bad thing, but here's a long list of statutes you should read to make sure you're not in violation," Paget said yesterday. "It seemed almost a scare tactic to convince me not to go ahead."

Paget was careful to issue warnings about his demo to attendees during his presentation today and that his demo was in no way for malicious purposes nor would it retain any data gathered from "owned" phones. His use of ham-radio frequency to carry the GSM signal got around any spectrum violation issues, he said.

He built the IMSI (International Mobile Subscribe Identity) Catcher, a phony GSM tower/base station, for about $1,500 using open-source technology, which he said is "a thousand times" cheaper than a similar commercial device used by providers. Aside from the device, the setup also used two directional antennas, and a Debian laptop running OpenBTS and Asterisk, an open source tool that turns a computer into a voice communications server. He used the device only to intercept and handle outgoing voice calls -- which were sent via voice-over-IP -- and not incoming calls nor data. SMS messaging would require getting caller ID information, which is difficult to obtain, he said.

"When the phone is looking for a signal, it looks for the strongest tower. This offers the best signal," Paget said, even though it's only 25 milliwatts.

The system only intercepts outbound calls, and callers whose phones connected to Paget's phony tower would get a recorded message when trying to dial out. "When attached to my tower, your phone is [considered] off, so incoming calls go straight to your voicemail," he said.

Overall, Paget captured anywhere from 17 to 30 phones at a time during the demo, even after configuring the base station to appear as an AT&T tower. The phones automatically defaulted to 2G because Paget's base station is 2G. The base station could also be configured to disable encryption, he notes, as well as to target specific brands of phones to connect to it.

Paget destroyed the USB key that held any data gathered from the cellphones after the demo, so he didn't know for sure the total number of phones that connected to it.

In previous tests, Paget found that iPhones most commonly connect to his fake GSM station.

He also discussed methods of speeding up the capture of cellphones during his presentation. The solution, he said, is to move to 3G. "3G and later is the solution ... 3G authentication is much better," Paget said. But that's no small feat: the conversion would entail upgrading all phones, networks, and towers, he said.

Adding encryption could help protect phones from a malicious GSM interception attack, as well as using VoIP and noticing when the 3G icon is no longer present during a call, he said.

This isn't the first time Paget has been at the center of controversy over his research. At Black Hat DC in 2007, his talk on cloning HID's RFID-based proximity cards was pulled from the program at the eleventh hour after the RFID vendor threatened him with a patent lawsuit. "I had no choice," said Paget, who was a researcher with IOActive at the time. "We were a very small company and we had to pull the talk ... they threatened patent litigation, which is extremely expensive and can cost [millions]" even if it turns out the suit has no legs, he said.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS



Security Services Reports

report Using Service Providers To Manage DDoS Threats
When it comes to the battle against distributed denial-of-service attacks, you are not alone. With the increasing use of third-party service providers, your organization likely has a huge arsenal of bandwidth, technology and know-how at its disposal. The challenge is to effectively marshal those resources among your providers and integrate them with your own security measures into a strategic and comprehensive DDoS protection plan.

report Hosted Web Security Services: Block Malware Before Your Border
Security service providers are now delivering a wide range of packaged offerings, including Web content filtering, anti-malware, data leak prevention, and many other capabilities. How can your organization take advantage of these Web security services, and how can you choose the right provider? This Dark Reading Tech Center report offers a look at these services and some recommendations on how best to implement them.

report You've Got (Secure) Mail: Using Service Providers to Boost Protection
The SaaS market is still in its infancy, but hosted e-mail security firms are leading the way, thanks to ease of implementation and many obvious benefits. Still, these services are not without risks. In this Dark Reading Tech Center report, we'll discuss how to determine what mix of in-house and hosted email security makes sense for your organization.

Other reports from the Security Services Tech Center:

Related Content

Establishing a Formal Cyber Intelligence Capability
Organizations are realizing that advanced intelligence capabilities consistently deliver substantial cost savings - with proactive insights on true threats, the intelligence to avoid false alarms, and the system and application availability required to preserve revenues and customer loyalty. But achieving these benefits requires organizations to establish a formal cyber intelligence capability. Read this whitepaper to learn about a proven, repeatable process with clearly established steps for setting up an in-house cyber security intelligence operation.

DDoS Mitigation: Best Practices for a Rapidly Changing Threat Landscape
Although DDoS attacks have become a mainstay of hackers' arsenals, their profile has changed considerably in the past year, making them an even greater threat to companies that conduct business online. DDoS attacks are larger, stealthier, more targeted, and more sophisticated than ever. Get best practices to enable your organization to keep pace with DDoS attacks while minimizing impact on business operations.

2012 Cyber Crime Threats and Trends
Get the highlights of 2011 cyber security trends and how those trends and others might unfold in 2012. This report is a strategic complement to daily tactical intelligence reports and provides IT security and business operations with actionable and relevant decision support.

Using Hybrid Routing to Optimize DNS Resolution Performance and Reliability
To create a satisfactory end user experience, enterprises must ensure that DNS resolution is fast and reliable. Learn more about how using a hybrid routing solution can greatly maximize performance while minimizing latency-and address your business' specific needs along the way.

A Cost Analysis of Approaches To DDoS Protection.
All organizations with an online presence or dependence on Internet-based systems need to fortify their defenses against DDoS attacks. DDoS can cost an organization in tangible losses and in more subtle ways. Read this whitepaper for a deeper perspective on the cost benefits of a dedicated, cloud-based DDoS service over an in-house hardware solution or over-provisioning through your ISP.




Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports