According to the "State of IT Security: Study of Utilities & Energy Companies" report -- which was conducted by Ponemon Institute and sponsored by security monitoring software vendor Q1 Labs -- more than three-quarters of global energy organizations surveyed admit to having suffered at least one data breach during the past 12 months. Sixty-nine percent think a data breach is very likely or likely to occur in the coming year.
"We were surprised that utility companies didn't put a higher priority on issues like smart grid and smart meters, where there's been a lot of concern about cyberthreats," says Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of Ponemon Institute. "Many of the people we talked to are still more focused on physical security than on cybersecurity."
It takes an average of 22 days for the energy companies in the study to detect insiders making unauthorized changes, the study says. Yet 43 percent of respondents ranked negligent or malicious insiders as their top security threat, with insiders the No. 1 root cause of data breaches among the companies surveyed.
Seventy-one percent of the respondents said their executive management team does not understand or appreciate the value of IT security, the study says. Sixty-seven percent of energy organizations were not using what they consider "state of the art" technologies to minimize risks to infrastructure-critical SCADA networks.
Respondents also expressed dissatisfaction with the tools they use to monitor their IT systems. Seventy-two percent said they don't think their monitoring systems are effective at gathering actionable intelligence, such as real-time alerts, threat analysis, and prioritization, about actual and potential exploits. Only 21 percent of global energy and utilities organizations think their existing controls can protect them against exploits and attacks through smart grid and smart meter-connected systems.
"After doing this survey, I'm more worried about the security of the power grid than I was before," Ponemon says. "In many cases, the people responsible for monitoring the cyber side are either being shot down by upper management or they don't have the right skill set to do the monitoring."
Have a comment on this story? Please click "Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
Fundamentals of User Activity Monitoring
Benchmarking normal activity and then monitoring for users who stray from that norm is an essential strategy for getting ahead of potential data and system breaches. But choosing the right tools is only part of the effort. Without sufficient training, efficient deployment and a good response plan, attackers could gain the upper hand.
Does SIEM Make Sense For Your Company?
A security information and event management system serves as a repository for all the security alerts and logging systems
from a firm's devices. But this can be overkill for a company that is understaffed or has overestimated its security information needs. In this report, we discuss 10 questions to ask yourself in determining whether SIEM makes sense for
you--and how to pick the right system if it does.
Monitoring Tools and Logs Make All The Difference
It's no longer a matter of "if" you get hacked, but when. In this special report, we take a look at ways to measure your security posture and the challenges that lie ahead with the emerging threat landscape.
Other reports from the Security Monitoring Tech Center:
| Sponsored by: |
Security Management 2.0: Time to Replace Your SIEM?
Is it time? Are you waving the white flag? Has your first gen SIEM failed to meet expectations despite your investment? If you are questioning whether your existing product or service can get the job done, you are not alone. Read this Securosis white paper to learn how easy it can be to replace your SIEM with a next generation solution.
IT Executive Guide to Security Intelligence: Transitioning from SIEM to Total Security Intelligence
Read this whitepaper to learn how adopting a next generation SIEM solution provides security intelligence, to allow organizations to maintain comprehensive and cost-effective information security. Discover how security intelligence enables critical concerns in five key areas: Data silo consolidation, threat detection, fraud discovery, risk assessment/risk management, and regulatory compliance.
The Return on Security of QRadar: Improving Operational Efficiencies in Federal Government
In this study, IANS interviewed two Q1 Labs customers using QRadar to assess their Return On Security (ROS). The two customers were providers of service to the U.S. Government and had highly secure environments dealing with extremely sensitive data. The data yielded from the interviews showed substantial benefit to the organizations for the cost, both in money and staff time.
SANS What Works Webcast: Worldwide Retailer Boosts Privacy with Security Intelligence
A leading retailer with stores worldwide was seeking a more innovative tool to protect customer privacy and intellectual property. PCI compliance mandated log collection, but a vast number of different tools generated an overwhelming amount of log data, making it difficult for the small security team to review it effectively. The solution the company chose had to fit into a diverse network, provide intelligent reporting and offer a centralized management console.
Learn How Security Intelligence Can Help Combat WikiLeaks Stuxnet and Advanced Threats
WikiLeaks and Stuxnet have illustrated a few fundamental IT security issues that have underscored the need for Total Security Intelligence to counter advanced threats and to detect anomalous behavior. See how government and commercial organizations are using QRadar as an integral component of their IT security program to identify emerging threats based on context and situational awareness.
MORE NEWSFEED >>>